https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/parser/SolrQueryParserBase.java#L1234
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/parser/SolrQueryParserBase.java#L1184 On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:10 PM Vincenzo D'Amore <v.dam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Mikhail, could you please share the code paths you found? > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:57 AM Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hello, Vincenzo. > > I traced both code pathes, they are different. It's hard to predict the > > difference between them. Probably some thorough microbenchmark can show > two > > times fold or so, but don't think it's significant for practical usage. > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:23 AM Vincenzo D'Amore <v.dam...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > talking about how to write solr queries I was investigating if there > is a > > > difference of performance in these two filter queries: field:[* TO *] > or > > > field:* > > > > > > In other words: > > > > > > q=*:*&fq=field:[* TO *]&rows=0 > > > > > > q=*:*&fq=field:*&rows=0 > > > > > > Could someone enlighten me? > > > > > > -- > > > Vincenzo D'Amore > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours > > Mikhail Khludnev > > > > > -- > Vincenzo D'Amore > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
