Hi Shawn, Thanks for your reply.
The core is used to test the solr setup by creating a trial collection. But other than that every collection created are exactly the same as existing one. I don't think this would create a problem, please brief me if it is otherwise. Thanks and regards, Bhuvaneshwar Venkatraman On Mon, Sep 16, 2019, 9:59 PM Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 9/16/2019 10:18 AM, Bhuvanesh wrote: > > Recently I created a cloud Solr 8.1.1 with zookeeper similar to cloud > Solr > > 6.6.2 which is in use. All configurations and schema files are exactly > > alike, but when I try to index the same documents Solr throws *cannot > > change field "FIELD_NAME" from* *index > options=DOCS_AND_FREQS_AND_POSITIONS > > to inconsistent index options=DOCS* for a specific field which is of type > > *string*. It is a required field so cannot be omitted. > > > > For another Collection in the same core(Solr 8.1.1), Solr throws *cannot > > change docValues type from SORTED_NUMERIC to SORTED for field > > "ANOTHER_FIELD_NAME"* to the field of type *string.* > > > > This is not existing solr upgrade, Solr 8.1.1 setup is completely new > from > > scratch and I am simply indexing the same data which we are using now > with > > solr 6.6.2 > > Those errors indicate that there is an existing index that was built > with a different schema, and the current index is not compatible with > the schema you have now. > > You're saying that you're indexing from scratch, but the error messages > are indicating otherwise. > > It's not possible to use an index from Solr 6 in Solr 8, and the errors > would be entirely different if you tried. > > This problem looks like you indexed some stuff in version 8, then > changed the schema, and are trying to index more. But your problem > description seems to contradict this theory, so I'm not sure what to think. > > The solution to these errors is to entirely delete all of the > $CORE/data/index directories from each index core related to the > collection, restart Solr or reload the collection, and reindex again > from scratch. > > Thanks, > Shawn >
