On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 11:11 AM Jörn Franke <jornfra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Do you commit after running the delete?
>

The  "commit=true" part would take care of that?



> > Am 09.09.2019 um 06:59 schrieb Jayadevan Maymala <
> jayade...@ftltechsys.com>:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I have a 3-node Solr cluster using a 3-node Zoookeeper system. Solr
> Version
> > is 7.3.0. We have batch deletes which were working a few days ago. All
> of a
> > sudden, they stopped working (I did run a yum update on the client
> machine
> > - not sure if it did anything to the Guzzle client). The delete is sent
> via
> > GuzzleHttp client from Lumen (php Microservices) framework. The delete
> > request reaches the Solr servers all right - here is from the log -
> > (qtp434091818-167594) [c:paymetryproducts s:shard1 r:core_node4
> > x:paymetryproducts_shard1_replica_n2] o.a.s.u.p.LogUpdateProcessorFactory
> > [paymetryproducts_shard1_replica_n2]  webapp=/solr path=/update
> >
> params={stream.body=<delete><query>category_id:"*5812b8c81874e142b86fbb0e*"</query></delete>&commit=true&wt=json}{deleteByQuery=category_id:"5812b8c81874e142b86fbb0e"
> > (-1644171174075170816),commit=} 0 3695
> > I tried setting both 'json' and 'xml' wt types. A dump of the response on
> > the client gives me only this -
> >
> > (
> >    [stream:GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Stream:private] => Resource id #403
> >    [size:GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Stream:private] =>
> >    [seekable:GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Stream:private] => 1
> >    [readable:GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Stream:private] => 1
> >    [writable:GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Stream:private] => 1
> >    [uri:GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Stream:private] => php://temp
> >    [customMetadata:GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Stream:private] => Array
> >        (
> >        )
> >
> > )
> >
> > If I execute the delete from Solr Admin panel, it works.  The query I am
> > executing from Admin to check if the data was deleted is this  (I am
> > forwarding Solr port to local machine).
> > http://127.0.0.1:8993/solr/paymetryproducts/select?q=category_id%20:%22
> > *5812b8c81874e142b86fbb0e*%22
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jayadevan
>

Reply via email to