That field was changed to docValues, but I optimized all the cores, which should rewrite every segment as docValues.
wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On May 30, 2019, at 7:37 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is odd. The only reason I know of that would happen is if there were no > docValues for that field in those documents. By any chance were docValues > added to an existing index without totally reindexing into a new collection? > > What happens if you just query the collection rather than the individual > core? I’m thinking using a streaming expression as a check….. > >> On May 30, 2019, at 6:41 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: >> >> 3/4 of the documents I’m getting back from /export are empty. This >> collection has four shards, so I’m querying the leader core on each shard >> with /export. The results start like this: >> >> {"numFound":912370,"docs":[{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{},{}, >> >> The final 1/4 of the results have UUIDs (the ID type). The id field is >> stored as docValues. This is the URL. >> >> http://hostname:8983/solr/decks_shard1_replica1/export?q=id:*&distrib=false&shards=shard1&fl=id&sort=id+asc >> >> Running 6.6.2, Solr Cloud. The total number of non-null ids from all four >> shards is a bit less than 1/4 of the document count. >> >> Any ideas about what is going on? >> >> wunder >> Walter Underwood >> wun...@wunderwood.org >> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) >> >
