Hello, Shawn, Toke Eskildsen and Solr Community: It might be too late to share, but the URL below is what I would try to share as the attachment. Again, Solr8.0.0 is somehow better, but I am doubting that it might be too better?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRSvs_kF0rPtJNyXCw7Pdl9-BQ9OMFQOOa8FAiV7NcfFDaZtAuW5CMfUR2GtWSwwIcH5mEESbs3mEos/pubhtml?gid=56815742&single=true > Yes. Whether is is noticeable is another question. For small indexes of for complex queries, the difference will be hard to measure. I mentioned it primarily as a general comment. With your 2M docs / 8GB index, I highly doubt you will see any difference. I see. I would like to give it a shot. >that's the facet.method parameter: fc vs. fcs Even though it might not be so different to each other, it might be interesting to test these performances. Sincerely, Kaya Ota 2019年5月21日(火) 19:13 Toke Eskildsen <t...@kb.dk>: > Kayak28 <kaya.ota....@gmail.com> wrote: > > For the next opportunity to share table-formatted data, > > what is the best way to share data with all of you? > > There's no hard recommendations, so anything where you can just click on a > link and see the data: Google Docs, GitHub Gists, Pastebin... > > > When we request a facet query (like below) to 2 Solrs: > > one with multiple segments and the other is only one > > segment, we will have different performance result? > > Yes. Whether is is noticeable is another question. For small indexes of > for complex queries, the difference will be hard to measure. I mentioned it > primarily as a general comment. With your 2M docs / 8GB index, I highly > doubt you will see any difference. > > > Can we configure up-front faceting or one-the-fly facet method? > > Yep, that's the facet.method parameter: fc vs. fcs > > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_7/faceting.html#field-value-faceting-parameters > > - Toke Eskildsen, Royal Danish Library >
