Thank you for a quick response David. Your suggestion works like a charm.
(And you were of course right about the query being manually edited). Regards, Fredrik > On 30 Apr 2019, at 14:48, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Frederik, > > In your example, I think you may have typed it manually since there are > mistakes like df=edismax which I think you meant defType=edismax. Any way, > assuming you need local-param syntax in 'q' (for tagging or whatever other > reason), then this means you must specify the query parser there and *not* > defType (don't set defType or set it to "lucene" which is the default). > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:17 AM Fredrik Rodland <s...@rodland.no> wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I seems SOLR-11501 may have changed more than just the ability to control >> the query parser set through {!queryparser}. We tag our queries to provide >> facets both with and without the query in the same request, just as tagging >> in fq described here: >> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/faceting.html#Faceting-TaggingandExcludingFilters >> >> After upgrading to 7.2 this does not work anymore (for the q-parameter) >> using edismax. We’ve tried to add the uf-paramter: >> >> select?q={!tag%3Dmytag}house&debug=query&rows=0&uf=query&df=edismax >> >> But this only result in q being allowed through, but not parsed - i.e.: >> "+(+DisjunctionMaxQuery(((synrank80:tagmytagingeniør)^8.0 | >> (stemrank40:tagmytagingeniør)^4.0… >> >> Does anybody have any experience or tips for enabling tagging of queries >> for SOLR >= 7.2? >> >> Regards >> >> Fredrik
