If you mean attach a debugger, solr is just like any other java program.
Pass in the standard java options at start up to have it listen or connect
as usual. The port is just a TCP port so ssh tunneling the debugger port
can bridge the gap with a remote machine (or a vpn).

That said the prior thread posts makes it sound like we are looking for a
case where the query parser or something above it is inappropriately eating
an exception relating to too many terms.

Did 5.x impose a new or reduced limit there?

On Wed, Jan 2, 2019, 1:20 PM Kay Wrobel <kwro...@hawkusa.com wrote:

> Is there any way I can debug the parser? Especially, the edismax parser
> which does *not* raise any exception but produces an empty parsedQuery?
> Please, if anyone can help. I feel very lost and without guidance, and
> Google search has not provided me with any help at all.
>
> > On Dec 28, 2018, at 9:57 AM, Kay Wrobel <kwro...@hawkusa.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here are my log entries:
> >
> > SOLR 7.x (non-working)
> > 2018-12-28 15:36:32.786 INFO  (qtp1769193365-20) [   x:collection1]
> o.a.s.c.S.Request [collection1]  webapp=/solr path=/select
> params={q=ac6023*&qf=tm_field_product^21.0&qf=tm_title_field^8.0&EchoParams=all&rows=10&wt=xml&debugQuery=true}
> hits=0 status=0 QTime=2
> >
> > SOLR 4.x (working)
> > INFO  - 2018-12-28 15:43:41.938; org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore;
> [collection1] webapp=/solr path=/select
> params={q=ac6023*&qf=tm_field_product^21.0&qf=tm_title_field^8.0&EchoParams=all&rows=10&wt=xml&debugQuery=true}
> hits=32 status=0 QTime=8
> >
> > EchoParams=all did not show anything different in the resulting XML from
> SOLR 7.x.
> >
> >
> > I found out something curious yesterday. When I try to force the
> Standard query parser on SOLR 7.x using the same query, but adding
> "defType=lucene" at the beginning, SOLR 7 raises a SolrException with this
> message: "analyzer returned too many terms for multiTerm term: ac6023"
> (full response: https://pastebin.com/ijdBj4GF)
> >
> > Log entry for that request:
> > 2018-12-28 15:50:58.804 ERROR (qtp1769193365-15) [   x:collection1]
> o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: analyzer
> returned too many terms for multiTerm term: ac6023
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.schema.TextField.analyzeMultiTerm(TextField.java:180)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.parser.SolrQueryParserBase.analyzeIfMultitermTermText(SolrQueryParserBase.java:992)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.parser.SolrQueryParserBase.getPrefixQuery(SolrQueryParserBase.java:1173)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.parser.SolrQueryParserBase.handleBareTokenQuery(SolrQueryParserBase.java:781)
> >        at org.apache.solr.parser.QueryParser.Term(QueryParser.java:421)
> >        at org.apache.solr.parser.QueryParser.Clause(QueryParser.java:278)
> >        at org.apache.solr.parser.QueryParser.Query(QueryParser.java:162)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.parser.QueryParser.TopLevelQuery(QueryParser.java:131)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.parser.SolrQueryParserBase.parse(SolrQueryParserBase.java:254)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.search.LuceneQParser.parse(LuceneQParser.java:49)
> >        at org.apache.solr.search.QParser.getQuery(QParser.java:173)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.prepare(QueryComponent.java:160)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:279)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:199)
> >        at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:2541)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.execute(HttpSolrCall.java:709)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.servlet.HttpSolrCall.call(HttpSolrCall.java:515)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:377)
> >        at
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:323)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1634)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:533)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:146)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:548)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:132)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextHandle(ScopedHandler.java:257)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:1595)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextHandle(ScopedHandler.java:255)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1317)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextScope(ScopedHandler.java:203)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:473)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:1564)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextScope(ScopedHandler.java:201)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1219)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:144)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:219)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:126)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:132)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.rewrite.handler.RewriteHandler.handle(RewriteHandler.java:335)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:132)
> >        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:531)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpChannel.handle(HttpChannel.java:352)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConnection.onFillable(HttpConnection.java:260)
> >        at org.eclipse.jetty.io
> .AbstractConnection$ReadCallback.succeeded(AbstractConnection.java:281)
> >        at org.eclipse.jetty.io
> .FillInterest.fillable(FillInterest.java:102)
> >        at org.eclipse.jetty.io
> .ChannelEndPoint$2.run(ChannelEndPoint.java:118)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.EatWhatYouKill.runTask(EatWhatYouKill.java:333)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.EatWhatYouKill.doProduce(EatWhatYouKill.java:310)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.EatWhatYouKill.tryProduce(EatWhatYouKill.java:168)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.strategy.EatWhatYouKill.run(EatWhatYouKill.java:126)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.ReservedThreadExecutor$ReservedThread.run(ReservedThreadExecutor.java:366)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:762)
> >        at
> org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$2.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:680)
> >        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> >
> > 2018-12-28 15:50:58.809 INFO  (qtp1769193365-15) [   x:collection1]
> o.a.s.c.S.Request [collection1]  webapp=/solr path=/select
> params={q=ac6023*&defType=lucene&qf=tm_field_product^21.0&qf=tm_title_field^8.0&rows=10&wt=xml&debugQuery=true}
> status=400 QTime=5
> >
> > Could this be a multi-term issue, but EDisMax does not actually raise an
> exception???
> >
> >
> >> On Dec 27, 2018, at 9:32 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> EchoParams=all
> >>
> >> May also be helpful to pinpoint differences in params from all sources,
> >> including request handler defaults.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>   Alex
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018, 8:25 PM Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 12/27/2018 10:47 AM, Kay Wrobel wrote:
> >>>> Now starting from SOLR version 5+, I receive zero (0) results back,
> but
> >>> more importantly, the Query Parser produces an empty parsedQuery.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is the same query issued to SOLR 7.6.0 (current version):
> >>>> https://pastebin.com/XcNhfdUD <https://pastebin.com/XcNhfdUD>
> >>>>
> >>>> Notice how "parsedQuery" now shows "+()"; an empty query string.
> >>>
> >>> I can duplicate this result on a 7.5.0 example config by sending an
> >>> edismax query with undefined parameters for df and qf. The other
> >>> field-related parameters for edismax are also undefined.  The following
> >>> URL parameters with the default example config will produce that parsed
> >>> query:
> >>>
> >>> q=ac6023*&defType=edismax&df=&qf=&debugQuery=on
> >>>
> >>> When a query is made and Solr's logging configuration is at its default
> >>> setting, Solr will log a line into its logfile containing all of the
> >>> parameters in the query, both those provided on the URL and those set
> by
> >>> Solr's configuration (solrconfig.xml).  Can you share this log line
> from
> >>> both the version that works and the version that doesn't?
> >>>
> >>> This is the log line created when I ran the query mentioned above:
> >>>
> >>> 2018-12-27 23:03:23.199 INFO  (qtp315932542-23) [   x:baz]
> >>> o.a.s.c.S.Request [baz]  webapp=/solr path=/select
> >>> params={q=ac6023*&defType=edismax&df=&qf=&debugQuery=on} hits=0
> status=0
> >>> QTime=0
> >>>
> >>> What I'm thinking is that there is a difference in the configuration of
> >>> the two servers or the actual query being sent is different.  Either
> >>> way, there's something different.  The two log lines that I have asked
> >>> for are likely to be different from each other in some way that will
> >>> explain what you're seeing.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Shawn
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>
> --
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for
> the addressee(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If
> you are not an intended recipient, you may not print, save or otherwise
> store the e-mail or any of the contents thereof in electronic or physical
> form, nor copy, use or disseminate the information contained in the email.
>
> If you are not an intended recipient,  please notify the sender of this
> email immediately.
>

Reply via email to