: > how would it fit c:"some phrase" into that structure? : : does this make sense? : : ( (a:some | b:some ) (a:phrase | b:phrase) ( c:"some phrase") )
that's pretty much exactly what pf does, the only distinction is you get... +( (a:some | b:some ) (a:phrase | b:phrase) ) ( c:"some phrase" ) ...where the "mm" param only applies to the (mandatory) boolean built using the qf. -Hoss
