And I forgot to mention TolerantUpdateProcessor, might be another approach.

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 12:57 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You can add, say, a ScriptUpdateProcessor that checks this for you
> pretty easily.
>
> Have you looked at the Overwrite=false option (assuming you're not
> assigning _version_ yourself)?
>
> Best,
> Erick
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:57 AM lstusr 5u93n4 <lstusr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have a scenario where I'm trying to enable batching on the solrj client,
> > but trying to see how that works with Optimistic Concurrency.
> >
> > From what I can tell, if I pass a list of SolrInputDocument to my solr
> > client, and a document somewhere in that list contains a `_version_` field
> > that would cause the Optimistic Concurrency check to fail:
> >  - all documents in the list before the conflicting doc get saved correctly.
> >  - no documents in the list after the conflicting doc get saved.
> >
> > What I would really like is to "send a list of documents to solr, set the
> > _version_ on all of these documents to -1 so that they don't save if they
> > already exist, and have solr save all of the "new" documents in the list".
> >
> > So three questions related to this:
> >
> > 1) Is Optimistic Concurrency the best mechanism for this, or is there some
> > other "don't overwrite" flag I can set that would work better?
> >
> > 2) If Optimisic Concurrency is the right way to go, Is there a mode that I
> > can set that would allow ALL non-conflicting documents in a batch to be
> > saved?
> >
> > 3) If questions 1 or 2 are not possible, I could  trap the resulting
> > RouteException  with a 409 code and remove the offending document from the
> > list. But:
> >   a) can I safely remove ALL documents in the list before the offending
> > one, assuming they've been saved?
> >   b) is there a better way to get the ID of the offending document besides
> > parsing the 'Error from server at
> > http://my.solr.instance:8983/solr/test_shard1_replica_n1: version conflict
> > for doc2` string from the exception?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Kyle

Reply via email to