Thanks a lot Erick for the documentation. I will go through it and get back to you in case of any queries.
Regards, Raunak On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:09 AM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > It Depends (tm). The behavior changed with Solr 7.5. Here are all the > gory details: > > > https://lucidworks.com/2017/10/13/segment-merging-deleted-documents-optimize-may-bad/ > > and for 7.5+ > https://lucidworks.com/2018/06/20/solr-and-optimizing-your-index-take-ii/ > > Best, > Erick > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:09 AM RAUNAK AGRAWAL > <agrawal.rau...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hey Guys, > > > > This is the sample query I am making: > > > > > > curl http://localhost:8983/solr/collection_name/stream -d > > 'expr=facet(collection_name,q="id:953",bucketSorts="week > > > desc",buckets="week",bucketSizeLimit=200,sum(sales),sum(amount),sum(days))' > > > > > > Also in my collection, I have almost 10 Billion documents with many > > deletions (close to 40%). I was planning to run optimise to merge the > > segments but spoke to admin team and lucidworks guys and they were > against > > it saying that it will make very large segment file. Is it true that > > optimise in solr should not be used, as it comes with other issues? > > > > Thanks > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 7:40 AM Toke Eskildsen <t...@kb.dk> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 15:52 -0700, RAUNAK AGRAWAL wrote: > > > > But for last few days, we are observing now that streaming facet > > > > response is slower that json facets. Also we have increased the > > > > number of documents in collection (30%). > > > > > > Export performance goes down when segment size goes way up, so I would > > > expect streaming to do the same. I would not expect a 30% increase to > > > cause something serious on that account though. How many documents in > > > your index? > > > > > > - Toke Eskildsen, Royal Danish Library > > > > > > >
