On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 12:43 -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 9/11/2018 12:14 PM, Boris Pasko wrote: > > > > > > > > Run top, press shift-M to sort by memory usage, then grab a > > atop: http://oi68.tinypic.com/10pokkk.jpg > > top: http://oi63.tinypic.com/msbpfp.jpg > Looking at the second one: > > The SHR value is showing 90GB. > Thanks! Thats a good catch. > > > Looks like the amount of memory in the machine is too large for "top" > to 128Gb
> It does look like you've got in the neighborhood of 600GB of index > data. 600-700Gb per node, correct. > Only 113GB of that data is cached. For some use cases, this will > be plenty of cached data for good performance. For others, it won't > be > anywhere near enough. For *perfect* performance, there will be > enough > memory for ALL of the index data to fit into memory. > > Thanks, > Shawn > ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– The information contained in this message and any attachments may be confidential and/or restricted and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited - please destroy all electronic and paper copies and notify the sender immediately.
