Yes, the status file is desiged to go into a "logs" directory, and not the snapshots directory.
Bill 2008/9/29 Jarek Zgoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I think I found the offending one by running snappuller -V: > > ++ ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no e02 'ls > /home/jzgoda/solr-master-data|grep '\''snapshot\.'\''|grep -v wip|sort > -r|head -1' > + snap_name=snapshot.status.e02 > > snapshot.status.e02 is (probably, I'm just guessing...) the snapinstaller > status file but it's always newest file in this directory, as it is > overwiritten by snapinstaller. It seems one can not keep status files in the > same directory as snapshots, am I right? > > Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2008-09-29, o godz. 15:38, przez Jarek Zgoda: > > > My master machine is peoperly creating snapshoots, but snappuler on slaves >> sometimes (I'd say, in most cases...) is unable to collect these snapshoots. >> In their logs I see "no new snapshoot found", although I see new snapshoot >> directory on master. >> >> What's puzzling for me are the entries in snappuller-status and >> snapshot.current - the snapshoot they treat as current is something called >> "snapshot.status.e2", not "snapshot.20080929...". >> >> Can someone give any hint as to what's going on? >> >> -- >> We read Knuth so you don't have to. - Tim Peters >> >> Jarek Zgoda, R&D, Redefine >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > -- > We read Knuth so you don't have to. - Tim Peters > > Jarek Zgoda, R&D, Redefine > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
