Did you look into UpdateRequestProcessors?
There is a truncate one there.
Regards,
Alex
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018, 12:44 AM Zahra Aminolroaya, <z.aminolro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I want to truncate my string field type due to its number of bytes limit. I
> wrote the following in my schema:
>
>
> <fieldType name="string" class="solr.StrField" sortMissingLast="true"/>
> <analyzer type="index">
> <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
> <filter class="solr.TruncateTokenFilterFactory"
> prefixLength="32700"/>
> </analyzer>
> <analyzer type="query">
> <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
> <filter class="solr.TruncateTokenFilterFactory"
> prefixLength="32700"/>
> </analyzer>
> </fieldType>
>
> However, I found that StrField (string) does not support specifying an
> analyzer. Besides, prefixLength in TruncateTokenFilterFactory could not be
> more than 1000.
>
> I want to have the same application of string. Do you think it is
> reasonable
> to use "text_general" field type with solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory filter
> to have the same application? Do I lose any feature?
>
> If I use text_general, it is not needed to truncate.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
