Hello all, Sorry I have taken so long to get back to Eriks reply, I used the technique of inserting a ? before the * to get at prototype working. However, if 1.3 does not support this anymore, then I really need to look into alternatives.
What would be the scope of the work to implement Erik's suggestion, I would have to ask my boss, but I think we would then contribute the code back to Solr. This should probably be continued on solr-dev, right? Brian Am Mittwoch, den 17.09.2008, 17:19 -0400 schrieb Mark Miller: > Alas no, the queryparser now uses an unhighlightable constantscore > query. I'd personally like to make it work at the Lucene level, but not > sure how thats going to proceed. The tradeoff is that you won't have max > boolean clause issues and wildcard searches should be faster. It is a > bummer though. > > - Mark > > dojolava wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have another question on the wildcard problem: > > > > In the previous Solr releases there was a workaround to highlight wildcard > > queries using the StandardRequestHandler by adding a ? in between: e.g. > > hou?* would highlight house. > > But this is not working anymore. Is there maybe another workaround? ;-) > > > > Regards, > > Mathis > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > > >> Probably your best bet is to create a new QParser(Plugin) that uses > >> Lucene's QueryParser directly. We probably should have that available > >> anyway in the core, just so folks coming from Lucene Java have the same > >> QueryParser. > >> > >> Erik > >> > >> > >> On Sep 2, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Brian Carmalt wrote: > >> > >> Hello all, > >> > >>> I need to get wildcard searches with highlighting up and running. I'd > >>> like to get it to work with a DismaxHandler, but I'll settle with > >>> starting with the StandardRequestHandler. I've been reading the some of > >>> the past mails on wildcard searches and Solr-195. It seems I need to > >>> change the default behavior for wildcards from PrefixFilter to a > >>> PrefixQuery. > >>> I know that I will have to deal with TooManyClauses Exceptions, but I > >>> want to paly around with it. > >>> > >>> I have read that this can only be done by modifying the code, but I > >>> cann't seem to find the correct section. Can someone point me in the > >>> right direction? Thanks. > >>> > >>> - Brian > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > >
