Hi,
I noticed that my mail program broke the test case by replacing a double
quote with a different UTF-8 character.
Here is the test case again and I hope it will work this time:
intersect(
cartesianProduct(tuple(fieldA=array(a,b,c,c)), fieldA, productSort="fieldA
asc"),
cartesianProduct(tuple(fieldB=array(a,c)), fieldB, productSort="fieldB asc"),
on="fieldA=fieldB"
)
I simplified it a bit, too. I still get one document with fieldA == a.
I would have expected three documents in the output, one with fieldA == a and
two with fieldB == c.
Did I misunderstand the docs of the intersect decorator or have I come across a
bug?
Best regards,
Christian Spitzlay
> Am 06.06.2018 um 10:18 schrieb Christian Spitzlay
> <christian.spitz...@biologis.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I don’t seem to get the behaviour of the intersect() stream decorator.
> I only ever get one doc from the left stream when I would have expected
> more than one.
>
> I constructed a test case that does not depend on my concrete index:
>
> intersect(
> cartesianProduct(tuple(fieldA=array(c,c,a,b,d,d)), fieldA,
> productSort="fieldA asc"),
> cartesianProduct(tuple(fieldB=array(c,c,a,d,d)), fieldB, productSort="fieldB
> asc"),
> on="fieldA=fieldB“
> )
>
>
> The result:
>
> {
> "result-set": {
> "docs": [
> {
> "fieldA": "a"
> },
> {
> "EOF": true,
> "RESPONSE_TIME": 0
> }
> ]
> }
> }
>
>
> I would have expected all the docs from the left stream with fieldA values a,
> c, d
> and only the docs with fieldA == b missing. Do I have a fundamental
> misunderstanding?
>
>
> Best regards
> Christian Spitzlay
>
>
