Hi, Thanks for the reply.
I am not using SOLR for indexing and serving search requests, i am using only the scripts for replication. Yes it looks like I/O, but my question is how to handle this problem and is there any optimal way to achieve this. Thanks. Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > Hi, > > Can't tell with certainty without looking, but my guess would be slow > disk, high IO, and a large number of processes waiting for IO (run vmstat > and look at the "wa" column). > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: rahul_k123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:56:48 PM >> Subject: Snappuller taking up CPU on master >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I am using snappuller to sync my slave with master, i am not using rsync >> daemon, i am doing Rsync using remote shell. >> >> When i am serving requests from the master when the snappuller is running >> (after optimization, total index is arnd 4 gb it doing the transfer of >> whole >> index), the performance is very bad actually causing timeouts. >> >> >> >> Any ideas why this happens . >> >> >> Any suggestions will help. >> >> >> Thanks. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Snappuller-taking-up-CPU-on-master-tp19638474p19638474.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Snappuller-taking-up-CPU-on-master-tp19638474p19642053.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
