Wouldn't all of this depend entirely on the tokenizers used? I was talking about phrases in a multi-token sense.
Regardless, I still think there should be similarity between dismax and edismax for the commonly parameters. (Either extend the edismax logic to dismax or vice versa) Regards, Sam On Tue, May 29, 2018, 23:16 Elizabeth Haubert < ehaub...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: > That would make sense. > Multi-term synonyms get into a weird case too. Should the single-term > words that have multi-term synonyms expand out? Or should the multi-term > synonyms that have single-term synonyms contract down and count as only a > single clause for pf2 or pf3. > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Alessandro Benedetti < > a.benede...@sease.io> > wrote: > > > I don't have any hard position on this, It's ok to not build a phrase > boost > > if the input query is 1 term and it remains one term after the analysis > for > > one of the pf fields. > > > > But if the term produces multiple tokens after query time analysis, I do > > believe that building a phrase boost should be the correct > interpretation ( > > e.g. wi-fi with a query time analiser which split by - ) . > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > --------------- > > Alessandro Benedetti > > Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director > > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > > -- > > Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html > > >
