I mean
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/query-settings-in-solrconfig.html#QuerySettingsinSolrConfig-useFilterForSortedQuery


On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote:

> Enum facets, facet refinements and https://lucene.apache.org/
> solr/guide/6_6/query-settings-in-solrconfig.html comes to my mind.
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:58 PM, Markus Jelsma <markus.jel...@openindex.io
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Anyone here to reproduce this oddity? It shows up in all our collections
>> once we enable the stats page to show filterCache entries.
>>
>> Is this normal? Am i completely missing something?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Markus
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original message-----
>> > From:Markus Jelsma <markus.jel...@openindex.io>
>> > Sent: Tuesday 1st May 2018 17:32
>> > To: Solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
>> > Subject: User queries end up in filterCache if facetting is enabled
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > We noticed the number of entries of the filterCache to be higher than
>> we expected, using showItems="1024" something unexpected was listed as
>> entries of the filterCache, the complete Query.toString() of our user
>> queries, massive entries, a lot of them.
>> >
>> > We also spotted all entries of fields we facet on, even though we don't
>> use them as filtes, but that is caused by facet.field=enum, and should be
>> expected, right?
>> >
>> > Now, the user query entries are not expected. In the simplest set up,
>> searching for something and only enabling the facet engine with facet=true
>> causes it to appears in the cache as an entry. The following queries:
>> >
>> > http://localhost:8983/solr/search/select?q=content_nl:nog&facet=true
>> > http://localhost:8983/solr/search/select?q=*:*&facet=true
>> >
>> > become listed as:
>> >
>> > CACHE.searcher.filterCache.item_*:*:
>> >     org.apache.solr.search.BitDocSet@&#8203;70051ee0
>> >
>> > CACHE.searcher.filterCache.item_content_nl:nog:
>> >     org.apache.solr.search.BitDocSet@&#8203;13150cf6
>> >
>> > This is on 7.3, but 7.2.1 does this as well.
>> >
>> > So, should i expect this? Can i disable this? Bug?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Markus
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
>



-- 
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev

Reply via email to