Hi Walter,

I haven’t seen this before, but it looks like 
https://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8071775

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Apr 20, 2018, at 7:54 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote:
> 
> I’m back.
> 
> I think I’m following the steps in Eric Hatcher’s slides: 
> https://www.slideshare.net/erikhatcher/solr-indexing-and-analysis-tricks
> 
> With a few minor changes, like using getIndexAnalyzer() because getAnalyzer() 
> is gone. And I’ve pulled the subroutine code into the main processAdd 
> function.
> 
> Any ideas about the cause of this error?
> 
> java.lang.ClassCastException: Cannot cast 
> jdk.internal.dynalink.beans.StaticClass to java.lang.Class
>       at 
> java.lang.invoke.MethodHandleImpl.newClassCastException(MethodHandleImpl.java:361)
>       at 
> java.lang.invoke.MethodHandleImpl.castReference(MethodHandleImpl.java:356)
>       at 
> jdk.nashorn.internal.scripts.Script$Recompilation$37$104A$\^eval\_.processAdd(<eval>:15)
> 
> This is the code up through line 15:
> 
>    // Generate minhashes using the "minhash" analyzer chain
>    var analyzer = 
> req.getCore().getLatestSchema().getFieldTypeByName('minhash').getIndexAnalyzer();
>    var hashes = [];
>    var token_stream = analyzer.tokenStream(null, new 
> java.io.StringReader(question));
>    var term_att = 
> token_stream.getAttribute(Packages.org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes.CharTermAttribute);
> 
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)
> 
>> On Apr 7, 2018, at 9:50 AM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote:
>> 
>> As I think more about this, we should have a signature processor that uses 
>> minhash. The MD5 signature processor was really easy to use.
>> 
>> wunder
>> Walter Underwood
>> wun...@wunderwood.org <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org>
>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)
>> 
>>> On Apr 7, 2018, at 4:55 AM, Emir Arnautović <emir.arnauto...@sematext.com 
>>> <mailto:emir.arnauto...@sematext.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Walter,
>>> I did this sample processor for the purpose of having doc values on 
>>> analysed field: https://github.com/od-bits/solr-multivaluefield-processor 
>>> <https://github.com/od-bits/solr-multivaluefield-processor> 
>>> <https://github.com/od-bits/solr-multivaluefield-processor 
>>> <https://github.com/od-bits/solr-multivaluefield-processor>>
>>> 
>>> (+ related blog: 
>>> http://www.od-bits.com/2018/02/solr-docvalues-on-analysed-field.html 
>>> <http://www.od-bits.com/2018/02/solr-docvalues-on-analysed-field.html> 
>>> <http://www.od-bits.com/2018/02/solr-docvalues-on-analysed-field.html 
>>> <http://www.od-bits.com/2018/02/solr-docvalues-on-analysed-field.html>>)
>>> 
>>> HTH,
>>> Emir
>>> --
>>> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
>>> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/ 
>>> <http://sematext.com/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 6 Apr 2018, at 23:46, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org 
>>>> <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Is there an easy way to define an analyzer chain in schema.xml then run it 
>>>> in an update request processor?
>>>> 
>>>> I want to run a chain ending in the minhash token filter, then take those 
>>>> minhashes, convert them to hex, and put them in a string field. I’d like 
>>>> the values stored.
>>>> 
>>>> It seems like this could all work in an update request processor. Grab the 
>>>> text from one field, run it through the chain, format the output tokens 
>>>> and add them to the field for hashes.
>>>> 
>>>> wunder
>>>> Walter Underwood
>>>> wun...@wunderwood.org <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org>
>>>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to