Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool

"Plant a Tree, Go Green"

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:23 AM, mganeshs <mgane...@live.in> wrote:

> Hello Deepak,
>
> We are not querying when indexing is going on. Whatever CPU graph I shared
> for 6.2.1 and 6.5.1 was only while we do batch indexing. During that time
> we
> don't query and no queries are getting executed.
>
> We index in a batch with a rate of around 100 documents / sec.


Is the batch rate same for both the cases (6.2.1 & 6.5.1)?


> And it's not
> so high too. But same piece of code and same config, with 6.2.1 CPU is
> normal and in 6.5.1 it always stays above 90% or 95%.
>
> @Solr Experts,
>
> From one of the thread by " Yasoob
> <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/CommitScheduler-Thread-blocked-due-to-
> excessive-number-of-Merging-Threads-tp4353964p4354334.html>
> " it's mentioned as
>
> /I compared the source code for the two versions and found that different
> merge functions were being used to merge the postings. In 5.4, the default
> merge method of FieldsConsumer class was being used. While in 6.6, the
> PerFieldPostingsFormat's merge method is being used. I checked and it
> looks
> like this change went in Solr 6.3. So I replaced the 6.6 instance with
> 6.2.1
> and re-indexed all the data, and it is working very well, even with the
> settings I had initially used. /
>
> Is anyone else facing this issue or any fixes got released in future build
> for this ?
>
> Keep us posted....
>
>
> Deepak Goel wrote
> > Please post the exact results. Many a times the high cpu utilisation may
> > be
> > a boon as it improves query response times
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, 13:55 mganeshs, &lt;
>
> > mganeshs@
>
> > &gt; wrote:
> >
> >> Regarding query times, we couldn't see big improvements. Both are more
> or
> >> less same.
> >>
> >> Our main worry is that, why CPU usage is so high in 6.5.1 and above ?
> >> What's
> >> going wrong ?
> >>
> >> Is any one else facing this sort of issue ? If yes, how to bring down
> the
> >> CPU usage? Is there any settings which we need to set ( not default one
> )
> >> in
> >> 6.5.1 ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
> >>
>
>
> Deepak Goel wrote
> > Please post the exact results. Many a times the high cpu utilisation may
> > be
> > a boon as it improves query response times
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, 13:55 mganeshs, &lt;
>
> > mganeshs@
>
> > &gt; wrote:
> >
> >> Regarding query times, we couldn't see big improvements. Both are more
> or
> >> less same.
> >>
> >> Our main worry is that, why CPU usage is so high in 6.5.1 and above ?
> >> What's
> >> going wrong ?
> >>
> >> Is any one else facing this sort of issue ? If yes, how to bring down
> the
> >> CPU usage? Is there any settings which we need to set ( not default one
> )
> >> in
> >> 6.5.1 ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
> >>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>

Reply via email to