well .. what if http://localhost:8983/solr/images/select?fl=content&q=id:1&start=1&wt=csv& csv.separator=&csv.encapsulator&csv.null=null ?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com> wrote: > sorry cut n paste error i'd get > > { > "responseHeader":{ > "zkConnected":true, > "status":0, > "QTime":0, > "params":{ > "q":"*:*", > "fl":"content", > "rows":"1"}}, > "response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[ > { > "content":"my-content-value"}] > }} > > > but you get my point > > > > On 18 April 2018 at 11:13, Lee Carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > for http://localhost:8983/solr/images/select?fl=content&q=id:1&start=1 > > > > I'd get > > > > { > > "responseHeader":{ > > "zkConnected":true, > > "status":0, > > "QTime":1, > > "params":{ > > "q":"*:*", > > "_":"1524046333220"}}, > > "response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[ > > { > > "id":"1", > > "content":"my-content-value", > > "*content-type*":"text/plain"}] > > }} > > > > when i want > > > > my-content-value > > > > > > > > On 18 April 2018 at 10:55, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Lee, from this description I don see why it can't be addressed by > fl,rows > >> params. What makes it different form the typical Solr usage? > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Lee Carroll < > >> lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Sure, we want to return a single field's value for the top matching > >> > document for a given query. Bare content rather than a full search > >> result > >> > listing. > >> > > >> > To be concrete: > >> > > >> > For a schema of fields id [unique key], content[stored],content-type[ > >> > stored] > >> > For a request: > >> > > >> > 1. Request URL: > >> > https://localhost/solr/content?q=id:1 > >> > 2. Request Method: > >> > GET > >> > > >> > We get a response > >> > HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: 16261 Content-Type: [content-type > value] > >> > > >> > and the body to be the raw value of content > >> > > >> > In short clients consume directly the most relevant "content" returned > >> from > >> > solr queries they construct. > >> > > >> > Naively I've implemented a subclass of RawResponseWriter which takes > the > >> > first docs values and adds them to the appended "content" stream. > >> Should I > >> > selectively add the content stream depending on if this is the final > >> > aggregation of cloud results (and provide a base class writer to act > if > >> > not), if so how do I know its the final aggregation. Or is adding the > >> > content stream within the response writer a bad idea. Should that be > >> being > >> > added to the response somewhere else? > >> > > >> > Failing all of the above is asking about response writer an X / Y > >> problem. > >> > Is their a better way to achieve the above. I'd looked at transforming > >> > response xml but that seemed not to offer a complete bare slate. > >> > > >> > Cheers Lee C > >> > > >> > > >> > On 17 April 2018 at 21:36, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > > In distributed search response writer is used twice > >> > > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_1/distributed-requests.html > >> > > once slave node that's where response writer yields "json" content > >> and it > >> > > upset aggregator node which is expect only javabin. > >> > > I hardly can comment on rrw, it's probably used for responding > >> separate > >> > > files in distrib=false mode. > >> > > You can start from describing why you need to create own response > >> writer. > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Lee Carroll < > >> > lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com > >> > > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Ok. My expectation was the response writer would not be used until > >> the > >> > > > final serialization of the result. If my response writer breaks > the > >> > > > response writer contract, exactly the way rawResponseWriter does > and > >> > just > >> > > > out puts a filed value how does that work? Does rawResponseWriter > >> > support > >> > > > cloud mode? > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On 17 April 2018 at 15:55, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > That's what should happen. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Expected mime type application/octet-stream but got > >> application/json. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Distributed search coordinator expect to merge slave responses > in > >> > > javabin > >> > > > > format. But slave's wt indicated json. > >> > > > > As far as I know only javabin might be used to distributed > search > >> > > > > underneath. Coordinator itself might yield json. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Lee Carroll < > >> > > > lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Sure > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > with 1 shard 1 replica this request works fine > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > 1. Request URL: > >> > > > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/images/image?q=id:1 > >> > > > > > 2. Request Method: > >> > > > > > GET > >> > > > > > 3. Status Code: > >> > > > > > 200 OK > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > logs are clean > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > with 2 shards 2 replicas the same request fails and in the > logs > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > INFO - 2018-04-17 13:20:32.052; [c:images s:shard2 > r:core_node7 > >> > > > > > x:images_shard2_replica_n4] org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore; > >> > > > > > [images_shard2_replica_n4] webapp=/solr path=/image > >> > > > > > params={df=text&distrib=false&qt=/image&fl=id&fl=score& > >> > > > > > shards.purpose=4&start=0&fsv=true&shard.url= > >> > > > > > http://10.224.30.207:8983/solr/images_shard2_replica_n4/ > >> > > > > > |http://10.224.30.207:7574/solr/images_shard2_replica_n6/ > >> > > > > > &rows=10&version=2&q=id:1&NOW=1523971232039&isShard=true&wt= > >> > javabin} > >> > > > > > hits=0 status=0 QTime=0 > >> > > > > > ERROR - 2018-04-17 13:20:32.055; [c:images s:shard1 > r:core_node3 > >> > > > > > x:images_shard1_replica_n1] org.apache.solr.common.SolrExc > >> eption; > >> > > > > > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$ > >> > > RemoteSolrException: > >> > > > > > Error > >> > > > > > from server at http://10.224.30.207:8983/ > >> > > solr/images_shard2_replica_n4 > >> > > > : > >> > > > > > Expected mime type application/octet-stream but got > >> > application/json. > >> > > > > > at > >> > > > > > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient. > >> > > > > > executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:607) > >> > > > > > at > >> > > > > > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request( > >> > > > > > HttpSolrClient.java:255) > >> > > > > > at > >> > > > > > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request( > >> > > > > > HttpSolrClient.java:244) > >> > > > > > at > >> > > > > > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBHttpSolrClient. > >> > > > > > doRequest(LBHttpSolrClient.java:483) > >> > > > > > at > >> > > > > > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBHttpSolrClient.request( > >> > > > > > LBHttpSolrClient.java:413) > >> > > > > > at > >> > > > > > org.apache.solr.handler.component.HttpShardHandlerFactory. > >> > > > > > makeLoadBalancedRequest(HttpShardHandlerFactory.java:273) > >> > > > > > at > >> > > > > > org.apache.solr.handler.component.HttpShardHandler. > >> > lambda$submit$0( > >> > > > > > HttpShardHandler.java:175) > >> > > > > > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) > >> > > > > > at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter. > >> > > > > call(Executors.java:511) > >> > > > > > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) > >> > > > > > at > >> > > > > > com.codahale.metrics.InstrumentedExecutorService$ > >> > > > > InstrumentedRunnable.run( > >> > > > > > InstrumentedExecutorService.java:176) > >> > > > > > at > >> > > > > > org.apache.solr.common.util.ExecutorUtil$ > >> > MDCAwareThreadPoolExecutor. > >> > > > > > lambda$execute$0(ExecutorUtil.java:188) > >> > > > > > at > >> > > > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker( > >> > > > > > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) > >> > > > > > at > >> > > > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run( > >> > > > > > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) > >> > > > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > INFO - 2018-04-17 13:20:32.056; [c:images s:shard1 > r:core_node3 > >> > > > > > x:images_shard1_replica_n1] org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore; > >> > > > > > [images_shard1_replica_n1] webapp=/solr path=/image > >> > params={q=id:1} > >> > > > > > status=200 QTime=17 > >> > > > > > INFO - 2018-04-17 13:20:32.055; [c:images s:shard1 > r:core_node3 > >> > > > > > x:images_shard1_replica_n1] org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore; > >> > > > > > [images_shard1_replica_n1] webapp=/solr path=/image > >> > > > > > params={df=text&distrib=false&qt=/image&fl=id&fl=score& > >> > > > > > shards.purpose=4&start=0&fsv=true&shard.url= > >> > > > > > http://10.224.30.207:8983/solr/images_shard1_replica_n1/ > >> > > > > > |http://10.224.30.207:7574/solr/images_shard1_replica_n2/ > >> > > > > > &rows=10&version=2&q=id:1&NOW=1523971232039&isShard=true&wt= > >> > javabin} > >> > > > > > hits=1 status=0 QTime=2 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I've implemented getcontenttype simply as > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > @Override > >> > > > > > public String getContentType(SolrQueryRequest request, > >> > > > > > SolrQueryResponse response) { > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > return "application/json;charset=utf-8"; > >> > > > > > } > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 16 April 2018 at 17:37, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Lee, > >> > > > > > > It's worth to send a stacktrace for such kind of inquiries. > >> > > > > > > I guess it goes from QueryComponent.mergeIds() or so. Shard > >> > > response > >> > > > > > should > >> > > > > > > contains <uniqueKey> from schema.xml field. > >> > > > > > > I encounter something like this while troubleshooting > >> > > > > > > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/transforming- > >> > > > > > > result-documents.html#TransformingResultDocuments- > >> > > > > > > CoresandCollectionsinSolrCloud > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Lee Carroll < > >> > > > > > lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I've created a custom response writer which extends > >> > > > > RawResponseWriter. > >> > > > > > > The > >> > > > > > > > basic operation is to output a single field value from the > >> top > >> > > > > matching > >> > > > > > > doc > >> > > > > > > > as the entire response. This works when shards = 1 but > fails > >> > when > >> > > > > > shards > >> > > > > > > > are greater than 1. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I throw an error if the field in question is missing from > >> the > >> > top > >> > > > > doc. > >> > > > > > > This > >> > > > > > > > happens when individual shards are being searched and only > >> id > >> > and > >> > > > > score > >> > > > > > > are > >> > > > > > > > returned. I'm sure I've committed a basic error. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Lee C > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > Sincerely yours > >> > > > > > > Mikhail Khludnev > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Sincerely yours > >> > > > > Mikhail Khludnev > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Sincerely yours > >> > > Mikhail Khludnev > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sincerely yours > >> Mikhail Khludnev > >> > > > > > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev