Hi, Do anyone knows if we can make any change to the the split=/|/orgs in the curl URL command to achieve the indexing of the multi-level Nested JSON?
Regards, Edwin On 26 March 2018 at 17:30, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to index the following JSON with 2 child level using the > following curl command using cygwin: > > curl 'http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/update/json/docs?spl > it=/|/orgs' > -H 'Content-type:application/json' -d ' > { > "id":"1", > "name_s": "JoeSmith", > "phone_s": 876876687, > "orgs": [ > { > "name1_s" : "Microsoft", > "city_s" : "Seattle", > "zip_s" : 98052, > "orgs":[{"name2_ss":"alan","phone2_ss":"123"},{"name2_ss":" > edwin","phone2_ss":"456"}] > }, > { > "name1_s" : "Apple", > "city_s" : "Cupertino", > "zip_s" : 95014, > "orgs":[{"name2_ss":"alan","phone2_ss":"123"},{"name2_ss":" > edwin","phone2_ss":"456"}] > } > ] > }' > > However, after indexing, this is what is shown in Solr. The 2nd child have > been place together under the 1st child as a multi-valued field, which is > wrong. If I have set the field for the 2nd child to be non-multi-valued > field, it will have error saying "multiple values encountered for non > multiValued field orgs2.name2_s:". > > { > "responseHeader":{ > "zkConnected":true, > "status":0, > "QTime":41, > "params":{ > "q":"phone_s:876876687", > "fl":"*,[child parentFilter=phone_s:876876687]", > "sort":"id asc"}}, > "response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[ > { > "id":"1", > "name_s":"JoeSmith", > "phone_s":"876876687", > "language_s":"en", > "_version_":1595632041779527680, > "_childDocuments_":[ > { > "name1_s":"Microsoft", > "city_s":"Seattle", > "zip_s":"98052", > "orgs.name2_ss":["alan", > "edwin"], > "orgs.phone2_ss":["123", > "456"], > "_version_":1595632041779527680}, > { > "name1_s":"Apple", > "city_s":"Cupertino", > "zip_s":"95014", > "orgs.name2_ss":["alan", > "edwin"], > "orgs.phone2_ss":["123", > "456"], > "_version_":1595632041779527680}]}] > }} > > > How can we structure the curl command so it will be able to accept child > of child relationship? We should not be doing any pre-processing to the > JSON to achieve that. > > I'm using Solr 7.2.1. > > Regards, > Edwin > >