Hi, Unfortunately that also gives no results (and it would not be practical, as for this example the numbering only goes up till 19 but others go up into the thousands etc)
Anybody with a pointer on this? Thanks already, Roel -----Original Message----- From: jagdish vasani [mailto:jagdisht.vas...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 16 maart 2018 12:41 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: question regarding wildcard-searches Hi paesen, Value - EO.1954.53.1 is indexed as below Eo 1954 53 1 Dot is removed.try with wildcard -? Like EO.1954.53.?? If you have 2 digits only in last.. I have not tried but you just check it. Hope it will solve your problem. Thanks, Jagdish On 16-Mar-2018 3:51 pm, "Paesen Roel" <roel.pae...@africamuseum.be> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > We are experimenting with solr, and I have a (I think) basic-level > question: > we have a multiple fields, all copied into a generic field so we can > search everything at once. > However we have a (for us) strange situation doing wildcard searches > for the contents of one specific field. > > Given in the schema: > > <field name="_text_" type="text_general" indexed="true" stored="false" > multiValued="true"/> > > <field name="genormaliseerdInventarisnummer" type="string" indexed="true" > stored="true"/> > <copyField source="genormaliseerdInventarisnummer" dest="_text_" /> > and lot of other fields exactly like 'genormaliseerdInventarisnummer'. > > > Now, we are certain that the field 'genormaliseerdInventarisnummer' > contains entries like 'EO.1954.53.1', 'EO.1954.53.2', EO.1954.53.3', > all the way up to '.19', we can query these directly by passing these > exact texts to the query on field '_text_' (our default search field). > Problem is: wildcard searches for these don't work, like 'EO.1954.53.*' > for example returns zero results. > > Why is that? > What needs to be adjusted? (and how?) > > Thanks already, > Roel > >
