Hi James
Yonick has a great blog explaining that, but I am on the bus so I do not have a 
link for you.

Yes, you can use nesting, and there are good reasons for doing so, but you will 
find it much easier to use flat fields. YMMV
Cheers -- Rick


On March 8, 2018 5:22:13 PM EST, "kasinger, james" 
<james.kasin...@nordstrom.com> wrote:
>Not quite. This will index the nested json into a flattened
>representation of the data, in multiple documents. We expect the
>resulting document to contain all the same nested fields as the json
>had. It should be identical. 
>
>Thanks for your response,
>Jams
>
>On 3/8/18, 1:26 PM, "Mikhail Khludnev" <m...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>    Will
>https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_1/transforming-and-indexing-custom-json.html
>    work
>    for you?
>    
>    On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:17 PM, kasinger, james <
>    james.kasin...@nordstrom.com> wrote:
>    
>    > Hi folks,
>> Has anyone had success indexing nested json into solr? I know that
>solr
>> prefers a flattened representation of the data, but I’m exploring
>potential
>    > solutions or workarounds for achieving this. Thanks in advance.
>    >
>> For instance I’m indexing this “document” and expect it to be
>presented in
>    > solr in the same way.
>    >
>    > {
>    >         "rolledupcolors": [
>    >          {
>    >             "Name": "BURGUNDY",
>    >             "ManiImageUrl":"1/_102069221.jpg",
>    >             "AltImageUrl":"3/_102067603.jpg",
>    >             "RGB":"",
>    >             "ColorFamily":"Red,Purple",
>    >             "SwatchImageUrl":"2/_102067602.jpg"
>    >           },
>    >           {
>    >               "Name": "CHARCOAL",
>    >                ........
>    >           }
>    >       ]
>    > }
>    >
>    > James
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    
>    
>    -- 
>    Sincerely yours
>    Mikhail Khludnev
>    

-- 
Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com 

Reply via email to