Mohit, I think you are thinking too hard - trying to optimize something that doesn't sound like it needs optimizing at this point in your project. I suggest you start with 1 Solr instance and then see if anything needs to be faster after you've pushed that to its limits.
Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: mohitranka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 2:15:25 AM > Subject: Re: Multiple Process of the SAME solr instance > > > Shalin, > I understand that :-) > > My problem is, if 1 solr instance process(save) 100 documents one-by-one, it > would not be very effective, I want to create 10 clones > (process/threads/cores) of the same solr instance, so that 10 documents get > processed(saved to solr) simaltaneously. > > Thanks and regards, > Mohit Ranka > > > Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:03 AM, mohitranka wrote: > > > >> > >> Otis, I understand that 1 solr instance can store n documents > >> (one-by-one). > >> My query was how to create m such instances/processes/threads so that m > >> documents get stored at a time, instead of 1 at a time. > >> > >> All the instances should read at the same port. > >> > >> > > You can send a batch of m documents at a time in the same XML. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Process-of-the-SAME-solr-instance-tp19533951p19546626.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
