Hi Raj Maybe this would be what you need. "Keyword Tokenizer This tokenizer treats the entire text field as a single token." There used to be an example showing the use of this in schema.xml, but I am away from my computer so it is hard to check. And everything Emir says is spot-on. Then you might want to go further with ngrams or a spelling check so the user need not be perfect. Cheers -- Rick
On March 6, 2018 5:40:02 AM EST, "Emir Arnautović" <emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote: >Hi Raj, >You need to get familiar with Solr analysis chain: >https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/understanding-analyzers-tokenizers-and-filters.html ><https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/understanding-analyzers-tokenizers-and-filters.html> > >When playing with it, use admin console analysis tab to see what tokens >are produced. > >And you need to understand your search requirements and cover them with >one or more fields. Note that you can use copyField to index the same >content in different ways to handle different search requirements. > >It is probably not what you want, but based on what you described, you >do not care about anything but the first token in your field, so you >can use LimitTokenCountFilter to index only the first token. In query >analysis you do not use it and with default operator OR you will get >what you want. > >HTH, >Emir >-- >Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection >Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/ > > > >> On 6 Mar 2018, at 10:55, Rajvinder Pal <rajvinder....@gmail.com> >wrote: >> >> Hi , >> I am new to Lucene. I have a requirement where when i request the >> organization name, it should show the matching organization names. >> >> I have written the q param as >> >> orgname_text: ABC test >> >> it is returning the result :- >> >> ABC test limited >> ABC XYZ limited >> DEF ABC limted >> test limited >> >> I want all the matching result which starts with either ABC or test. >so >> here i dont want DEF ABC limited. Please let me know what feature or >> syntax i should use to get the required result. >> >> Thanks >> Raj -- Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
