On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Wei <weiwan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks all! It's really great learning. A bit off the topic, after I > enabled facet.method = uif in solr cloud, the faceting performance is > actually much worse than the original fc( ~1000 ms with uif vs ~200 ms > with fc). My cloud has 8 shards with 6 replicas in each shard. I do see > that fieldValueCache is getting utilized. Any reason uif could be so > slow?
I haven't seen that before. Are you sure it's not the first time faceting on a field? uif has big upfront cost, but is usually faster once that cost has been paid. -Yonik > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:41 AM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Great, thanks for tracking that down! >> It's interesting that a mincount of 0 disables uif processing in the >> first place. IIRC, it's only the hash-based method (as opposed to >> array-based) that can't return zero counts. >> >> -Yonik >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Alessandro Benedetti >> <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: >> > *Update* : This has been actually already solved by Hoss. >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11711 and this is the Pull >> > Request : https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/279/files >> > >> > This should go live with 7.3 >> > >> > Cheers >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- >> > --------------- >> > Alessandro Benedetti >> > Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director >> > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io >> > -- >> > Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html >>
