Hi Steve,

Thank you for your response.
The Jira was created : SOLR-11968

I let you add your comments.

Regards.

Dominique


Le sam. 10 févr. 2018 à 20:30, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi Dominique,
>
> Looks like it’s a bug, not sure where exactly though.  Can you please
> create a JIRA?
>
> I can see the same behavior on master too, not just on the
> releases/lucene-solr/6.6.2 tag.
>
> One interesting thing I found is that if I remove the stop filter from the
> query analyzer, I get the following for qq=“maillot om”:
>
> +((name_text_gp:maillot) (((+name_text_gp:olympiqu +name_text_gp:de
> +name_text_gp:marseil) name_text_gp:om)))
>
> (btw my stop list only has “de” on it)
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Feb 10, 2018, at 2:12 AM, Dominique Bejean <dominique.bej...@eolya.fr>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > More info.
> >
> > When I test the analisys for the field type the synonyms are correctly
> > expanded for both expressions
> >
> > om maillot
> > maillot om
> > olympique de marseille maillot
> > maillot olympique de marseille
> >
> > resulting outputs always include the following terms (obvioulsly not
> always
> > in the same order)
> >
> > olympiqu om marseil maillot
> >
> >
> > So, i suspect an issue with edismax query parser.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > Dominique
> >
> >
> > Le ven. 9 févr. 2018 à 18:25, Dominique Bejean <
> dominique.bej...@eolya.fr>
> > a écrit :
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am trying multi words query time synonyms with Solr 6.6.2and
> >> SynonymGraphFilterFactory filter as explain in this article
> >>
> >>
> https://lucidworks.com/2017/04/18/multi-word-synonyms-solr-adds-query-time-support/
> >>
> >> My field type is :
> >>
> >> <fieldType name="textSyn" class="solr.TextField"
> >> positionIncrementGap="100">
> >>    <analyzer type="index">
> >>      <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> >>      <filter class="solr.ElisionFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true"
> >>            articles="lang/contractions_fr.txt"/>
> >>      <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> >>      <filter class="solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory"/>
> >>      <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" words="stopwords.txt"
> >> ignoreCase="true"/>
> >>      <filter class="solr.FrenchMinimalStemFilterFactory"/>
> >>    </analyzer>
> >>    <analyzer type="query">
> >>      <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> >>      <filter class="solr.ElisionFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true"
> >>            articles="lang/contractions_fr.txt"/>
> >>      <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> >>      <filter class="solr.SynonymGraphFilterFactory"
> >> synonyms="synonyms.txt"
> >>            ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
> >>      <filter class="solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory"/>
> >>      <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" words="stopwords.txt"
> >> ignoreCase="true"/>
> >>      <filter class="solr.FrenchMinimalStemFilterFactory"/>
> >>    </analyzer>
> >>  </fieldType>
> >>
> >>
> >> synonyms.txt contains the line
> >>
> >> om, olympique de marseille
> >>
> >>
> >> The order of words in my query has an impact on the generated query in
> >> edismax
> >>
> >> q={!edismax qf='name_text_gp' v=$qq}
> >> &sow=false
> >> &qq=...
> >>
> >> with "qq=om maillot" or "qq=olympique de marseille maillot", I can see
> the
> >> synonyms expansion. It is working as expected.
> >>
> >> "parsedquery_toString":"+(((+name_text_gp:olympiqu +name_text_gp:marseil
> >> +name_text_gp:maillot) name_text_gp:om))",
> >> "parsedquery_toString":"+((name_text_gp:om (+name_text_gp:olympiqu
> >> +name_text_gp:marseil +name_text_gp:maillot)))",
> >>
> >>
> >> with "qq=maillot om" or "qq=maillot olympique de marseille", I can see
> the
> >> same generated query
> >>
> >> "parsedquery_toString":"+((name_text_gp:maillot) (name_text_gp:om))",
> >> "parsedquery_toString":"+((name_text_gp:maillot) (name_text_gp:om))",
> >>
> >> I don't understand these generated queries. The first one looks like the
> >> synonym expansion is ignored, but the second one shows it is not ignored
> >> and only the synonym term is used.
> >>
> >>
> >> What is wrong in the way I am doing this ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Dominique
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dominique Béjean
> >> 06 08 46 12 43
> >>
> > --
> > Dominique Béjean
> > 06 08 46 12 43
>
> --
Dominique Béjean
06 08 46 12 43

Reply via email to