Hi Deepak,
Look at the score of your response results.
You can do this in Debug mode.
Rahul.

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:18 AM, Deepak Udapudi <dudap...@delta.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have the below scenario in full name search that we are trying to
> implement.
>
> Solr configuration :-
>
> fieldType name="keywords_text" class="solr.TextField">
>     <analyzer type="index">
>       <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
>       <filter class="solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory"/>
>     </analyzer>
>     <analyzer type="query">
>       <tokenizer class="solr.PathHierarchyTokenizerFactory"
> delimiter="/"/>
>       <filter class="solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory"/>
>     </analyzer>
>   </fieldType>
>
>
> <field name="keywords" type="keywords_text" indexed="true" stored="false"
> multiValued="true" />
>   <copyField source="fullName" dest="keywords" docValues="true" />
>   <copyField source="officeName" dest="keywords" docValues="true" />
>   <copyField source="facilityName" dest="keywords" docValues="true" />
> </field>
>
> Scenario :-
>
> Solr configuration has office name, facility name and the full name as
> displayed above.
> We are searching based on the input name with the records sorts by
> distance.
>
> Problem :-
>
> I am getting the records matching the full name sorted by distance.
> If the input string(for ex Dae Kim) is provided, I am getting the records
> other than Dae Kim(for ex Rodney Kim) too at the top of the search results
> including Dae Kim
> just before the next Dae Kim because Kim is matching with all the fields
> like full name, facility name and the office name. So, the hit frequency is
> high and it's
> distance is less compared to the next Dae Kim in the search results with
> higher distance.
>
> Expected results :-
>
> I want to see all the records for Dae Kim to be seen at the top of the
> search results sorted by distance without any irrelevant results.
>
> Queries :-
>
> What is the fix for the above problem if anyone has faced it?
> How do I handle the problem?
>
> Any inputs would be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Deepak
>
>
>
>
> The information contained in this email message and any attachments is
> confidential and intended only for the addressee(s). If you are not an
> addressee, you may not copy or disclose the information, or act upon it,
> and you should delete it entirely from your email system. Please notify the
> sender that you received this email in error.
>



-- 
"Learning is not necessary, neither is survival"

Reply via email to