defType=??? Probably dismax. It doesn’t do *:* like edismax or lucene.
> On Jan 4, 2018, at 20:39, Nawab Zada Asad Iqbal <khi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Erik > Here is the output, > > http://localhost:8983/solr/filesearch/select?fq=id:1193&q.alt=*:*&debugQuery=true > > > - parsedquery: "+MatchAllDocsQuery(*:*)", > > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/filesearch/select?fq=id:1193&q=*:*&debugQuery=true > > > - parsedquery: "+DisjunctionMaxQuery((user_email:*:* | user_name:*:* | > tags:*:* | (name_shingle_zh-cn:, , name_shingle_zh-cn:, ,) | id:*:*)~0.01) > DisjunctionMaxQuery(((name_shingle_zh-cn:", , , ,"~100)^100.0 | > tags:*:*)~0.01)", > > > > I find it perplexing as the default values for qf and pf are very different > from above so I am not sure where these fields are coming from (although > they are all valid fields) > e.g. following query uses the my expected set of pf and qf. > > http://localhost:8983/solr/filesearch/select?fq=id:1193&q=hello&debugQuery=true > > > > - parsedquery: "+DisjunctionMaxQuery(((name_token:hello)^60.0 | > user_email:hello | (name_combined:hello)^10.0 | (name_zh-cn:hello)^10.0 | > name_shingle:hello | comments:hello | user_name:hello | description:hello | > file_content_zh-cn:hello | file_content_de:hello | tags:hello | > file_content_it:hell | file_content_fr:hello | file_content_es:hell | > file_content_en:hello | id:hello)~0.01) > DisjunctionMaxQuery((description:hello | (name_shingle:hello)^100.0 | > comments:hello | tags:hello)~0.01)", > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hmm, seems odd. What happens when you attach &debug=query? I'm curious how >> the parsed queries differ. >> >>> On Jan 4, 2018 15:14, "Nawab Zada Asad Iqbal" <khi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In my SearchHandler solrconfig, i have q.alt=*:* . This allows me to run >>> queries which only have `fq` filters and no `q`. >>> >>> If I remove q.alt from the solrconfig and specify `q=*:*` in the query >>> parameters, it does not give any results. I also tried `q=*` but of no >>> avail. >>> >>> Is there some good reason for this behavior? Since I already know a work >>> around, this question is only for my curiosity. >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> Nawab >>> >>
