Thank you very much for your help.

2017/12/29 15:46 "Mikhail Khludnev" <m...@apache.org>:

> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Kamuela Lau <kamuela....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thank you very much for the confirmation.
> >
> > As BJQFacet doesn't support limit, I have the impression that if the
> number
> > of documents is large,
> > there would be a noticeable decrease in performance. Is this correct?
> >
>
> No. Limiting facet almost never makes it faster.
>
>
> >
> > If so, I was considering instead using JSON Facet API to create
> > parent/child relationships with facets, however I could not find an
> > official document with specific details.
> > JSON Facet API appears to be quite fast,  but all the documentation I
> could
> > find was at the link below:
> > http://yonik.com/json-facet-api/
> >
> > I would like to investigate more about how to use JSON Facet API, so any
> > information or a point in the right direction would be very helpful.
> >
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_2/json-facet-api.html
>
> You are welcome.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > Block join works in the single core only. Please check the docs.
> > > BJQFacet doesn't support limit and sort.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Kamuela Lau <kamuela....@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I am currently trying to figure out a way to apply a parent/child
> > > > relationship between two cores to searches.
> > > > I thought that BlockJoin Facet could be a good way to do this, but I
> > > would
> > > > like to know, is it impossible to use limit and sort with BlockJoin
> > > Facet?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Kamu
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Kamuela Lau <kamuela....@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am working on applying parent/child types to search using Solr,
> and
> > > > > wanted to inquire about two things.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) BlockJoin Facet
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently, there are two cores. The first core (the item core) has
> 16
> > > > > million documents, and the second core (the product core) has 3
> > million
> > > > > documents.
> > > > > The product core is the parent, and the item core is the child.
> > > > >
> > > > > To apply this parent/child relationship to searches, I thought
> that I
> > > > > could use BlockJoin Facet,
> > > > > but because the number of documents being searched is so large, I
> am
> > > > > worried about the decrease in performance of Solr when using
> > BlockJoin
> > > > > Facet.
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought it may be possible to avoid dips in performance while
> using
> > > > > BlockJoin Facet by using limit and sort,
> > > > > however when I tried to look up more information about this, I was
> > > unsure
> > > > > of if that is possible.
> > > > >
> > > > > When using BlockJoin Facet, is it not possible to use limit and
> sort?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) JSON Facet API
> > > > >
> > > > > While I was researching about the above problem, I came across JSON
> > > Facet
> > > > > API.
> > > > > Is it possible to do the same thing as BlockJoin Facet with JSON
> > Facet
> > > > API?
> > > > > If it is possible, what is the most appropriate way to use each
> one?
> > > > >
> > > > > I was unable to find an official document with more detailed
> > > information
> > > > > about Solr's JSON Facet API,
> > > > > so if anyone knows of a relevant resource or reference material, I
> > > would
> > > > > be grateful if you could share it.
> > > > >
> > > > > I apologize for the rather open-ended question, but an answer or
> > even a
> > > > > point in the right direction (an article
> > > > > or resource) would be greatly appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Kamu
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sincerely yours
> > > Mikhail Khludnev
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
>

Reply via email to