It seems that there is something in latest Solr version that you might be able to use. From release notes:
“The new facet.matches parameter returns facet buckets only for terms that match a regular expression.” HTH, Emir -- Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/ > On 21 Dec 2017, at 18:45, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You might be able to do some interesting with the JSON faceting > approach, but I confess I don't know for sure. > > Best, > Erick > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: >> On 12/20/2017 2:40 PM, Arun Rangarajan wrote: >>> >>> I think multi-select faceting does the opposite of what I want. I want the >>> facet to include the filters. >> >> >> You don't have any filters to include or exclude. You would need fq >> parameters to use multi-select faceting. But as you say, it doesn't do what >> you want anyway. >> >> <snip> >> >>> As you can see, hierarchy and interests are both multi-valued string >>> fields. >>> >>> I want pivot facet counts for the two fields: hierarchy and interests, but >>> filtered for only two values of interests field: hockey, soccer. >> >> >> <snip> >> >>> The counts for hockey and soccer are correct. But I am also getting the >>> facet counts for other values of interests (like tennis, futbol, etc.,) >>> since these values match the query. I understand why this is happening. >>> This is why I said I want to do something like >>> >>> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/faceting.html#Faceting-Limitingfacetwithcertainterms >>> for facet pivots. Is there a way to do that? >> >> >> I see now. It's showing the other values because the fields are multivalued >> and the matching documents actually do contain those values, so Solr is >> working the way I expected it to, but your data is different than I was >> thinking. It's the multivalued aspect that makes this problematic. >> >> I was not aware that you could limit the terms with field faceting. Either >> the syntax to achieve what you want is different than what you are using, or >> it just can't be done with pivot faceting at the moment because there are no >> options to do it. I'm guessing the latter, but since I am not familiar with >> the code, I cannot say for sure. Hopefully somebody else can speak up with >> an option, but I'm not expecting that to happen. >> >> Thanks, >> Shawn
