Do not use index time boosting, please. When something is deprecated, the usual process is that that functionality is supported for one major version after deprecation, then the devs are free to remove it. Index time boosting is not supported in 7.0 even though it is in 6x, from CHANGES.txt, the 7.0 section
Index-time boosts are not supported anymore. If any boosts are provided, they will be ignored by the indexing chain So any work you put in to this will have to be re-done the first time you upgrade. As for what class calculates the score, it's complicated ;). It's often easiest to add &debug=true&debug.explain.structured=true to your query and you'll see how the score is calculated. Best, Erick On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Venkateswarlu Bommineni <bvr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply Amit. > > I have Solr 6.6 source code and I can still see the code which sets the > index level boost value. > > If the class name is handy for you , could you please tell me where we will > calculate the score of a document. so that i can just go through the code. > > Thanks, > Venkat. > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Amrit Sarkar <sarkaramr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Venkat, >> >> FYI: Index time boosting has been deprecated from latest versions of Solr: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6819. >> >> Not sure which version you are on, but best consider the comments on the >> JIRA before using it. >> >> Amrit Sarkar >> Search Engineer >> Lucidworks, Inc. >> 415-589-9269 >> www.lucidworks.com >> Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks >> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2 >> Medium: https://medium.com/@sarkaramrit2 >> >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Venkateswarlu Bommineni <bvr...@gmail.com >> > >> wrote: >> >> > Hello Guys, >> > >> > I would like to understand how index time boosting works in Solr. and how >> > it is relates to ommitNorms property in schema.xml. >> > >> > and i am trying to understand how it works internally , if you have any >> > documentation please provide. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Venkat. >> > >>
