Also, If you're looking at all constraints, you shouldn't need refine:true But if you do need it, it was only added in Solr 7.0 (and I see you're using 6.6)
-Yonik On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Kenny Knecht <ke...@ontoforce.com> wrote: >> Hi Yonik, >> >> I am aware of the estimate on the hll. But we don't use the hll as a >> baseline for comparison. We ask the values for one facet (for example >> Gender). We store these counts for each bucket. Next we do another request. >> This time for a facet and a subfacet (for example Gender x Type). We sum >> all the values of Type with the same Gender and compare these sums with the >> numbers of previous request. These numbers differ by 60% which is quite >> worrying. Not always it depends on the facet, but still. >> Did you get any reports like this? > > Nope. The counts for the scenario you describe should add up exactly > for single-valued fields. Are you sure you're adding in the "missing" > bucket? > > When you some up the sub-facets on Type, do you get a value under or > over the counts on the parent facet? > Verify that Type is single-valued. One would not expect facets on a > multi-valued field to add up in the same way. > Verify that you're getting all of the Type constraints by using a > limit of -1on that sub-facet. > > -Yonik
