I'm not very familiar with shingles but it seems to be that you should have ShingleFilter at index time and make the query as a phrase query?
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Mck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So then i change type="string" to type="shingleString" along with > > > [snip] > > > <analyzer type="query"> > > > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> > > > <filter class="solr.ShingleFilterFactory" outputUnigrams="true" > outputUnigramIfNoNgram="true" maxShingleSize="99" /> > > > </analyzer> > > Debugging ShingleFilter I see that without quotes the shingles > StringBuffer array consists of just the current token. > > When the query does have quotes the shingles array fills up with the > expected shingles. > And the Query (infact a MultiPhraseQuery) > returned from SolrQueryParser.getFieldQuery() > looks like > > list_entry_shingle:"(abcd abcd efgh abcd efgh ijkl) (efgh efgh ijkl) ijkl" > > I'm struggling to make sense of this. > How can the shingles be matched if they aren't quoted? > Why put the parenthesis () when the query has default operator OR? > > I would be expecting a Query instead like: > abcd "abcd efgh" "abcd efgh ijkl" efgh "efgh ijkl" ijkl > > (This with the ShingleFilter disabled does indeed work perfectly). > > Am i barking up the wrong tree? > Is there a way to get the shingles phrased? > > Otis, you mentioned this briefly on your reply on the dev list: > > Make sure you turn them into phrase queries > > did you mean here something more than just quoting the original query? > > ~mck > > -- > "Claiming Java is easier than C++ is like saying that K2 is shorter than > Everest." Larry O'Brien > | semb.wever.org | sesat.no | sesam.no | > -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
