First, thanks for the quick response. Yes, it sounds like the same problem!!
I did a bunch of searching before repoting the issue, I didn't come across that JIRA or I wouldn't have reported it. My apologies for the duplication (although it is a new JIRA). Is there a good place to start searching in the future? I'm a fairly experiences Solr user, and I don't mind slogging through Java code. Meanwhile I'll follow the JIRA so I know when it gets fixed. Thanks!! -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Matheis [mailto:matheis.ste...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:32 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 7.0.0 -- can it use a 6.5.0 data repository (index) That sounds like https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_SOLR-2D11406&d=DwIFaQ&c=z0adcvxXWKG6LAMN6dVEqQ&r=4gLDKHTqOXldY2aQti2VNXYWPtqa1bUKE6MA9VrIJfU&m=iYU948dQo6G0tKFQUguY6SHOZNZoCOEAEv1sCf4ukcA&s=HvPPQL--s3bFtNyBdUiz1hNIqfLEVrb4Cu-HIC71dKY&e= if i'm not mistaken? -Stefan On Sep 27, 2017 8:20 PM, "Wayne L. Johnson" <wjohn...@familysearch.org> wrote: > I’m testing Solr 7.0.0. When I start with an empty index, Solr comes > up just fine, I can add documents and query documents. However when I > start with an already-populated set of documents (from 6.5.0), Solr > will not start. The relevant portion of the traceback seems to be: > > Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException > > at java.util.Objects.requireNonNull(Objects.java:203) > > … > > at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.reduce( > ReferencePipeline.java:479) > > at org.apache.solr.index.SlowCompositeReaderWrapper.<init>( > SlowCompositeReaderWrapper.java:76) > > at org.apache.solr.index.SlowCompositeReaderWrapper.wrap( > SlowCompositeReaderWrapper.java:57) > > at org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.<init>( > SolrIndexSearcher.java:252) > > at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.openNewSearcher(SolrCore.java: > 2034) > > ... 12 more > > > > In looking at the de-compiled code (SlowCompositeReaderWrapper), lines > 72-77, and it appears that one or more “leaf” files doesn’t have a > “min-version” set. That’s a guess. If so, does this mean Solr 7.0.0 > can’t read a 6.5.0 index? > > > > Thanks > > > > Wayne Johnson > > 801-240-4024 > > wjohnson...@ldschurch.org > > [image: familysearch2.JPG] > > >
