Well, 15 second responses are not what I'd expect either. But two things (just looked again)
1> note that the time to assemble the debug information is a large majority of your total time (14 of 15.3 seconds). 2> you're specifying 600 rows which is quite a lot as each one requires that a 16K block of data be read from disk and decompressed to assemble the "fl" list. so one quick test would be to set rows=1 or something. All that said, the QTime value returned does _not_ include <1> or <2> above and even 4 seconds seems excessive. Best, Erick On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:54 AM, sasarun <sasa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Erick, > > Thank you for the quick response. Query time was relatively faster once it > is read from memory. But personally I always felt response time could be far > better. As suggested, We will try and set up in a non HDFS environment and > update on the results. > > Thanks, > Arun > > > > -- > Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
