29G on a 30G machine is still a bad config. That leaves no space for the OS, file buffers, or any other processes.
Try with 8G. Also, give us some information about the number of docs, size of the indexes, and the kinds of search features you are using. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Sep 18, 2017, at 7:55 AM, shamik <sham...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Apologies, 290gb was a typo on my end, it should read 29gb instead. I started > with my 5.5 configurations of limiting the RAM to 15gb. But it started going > down once it reached the 15gb ceiling. I tried bumping it up to 29gb since > memory seemed to stabilize at 22gb after running for few hours, of course, > it didn't help eventually. I did try the G1 collector. Though garbage > collection was happening more efficiently compared to CMS, it brought the > nodes down after a while. > > The part I'm trying to understand is whether the memory footprint is higher > for 6.6 and whether I need an instance with higher ram (>30gb in my case). I > haven't added any post 5.5 feature to rule out the possibility of a memory > leak. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
