Thanks Shawn!

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:

> On 9/11/2017 9:36 AM, Gunalan V wrote:
> > In our project we are planning to use SOLR and I'm new to it. So, what is
> > the latest stable version we can use and that is supported by Apache?
>
> As of four days ago, the latest release is 6.6.1.  This is a point
> release, intended to fix known bugs in the 6.6.0 version without adding
> any new features.
>
> All releases are considered "stable", or they would not be released.
> Every attempt is made to find and fix problems before release, but bugs
> do happen.
>
> > Kindly let me know your suggestions because we started with installing
> SOLR
> > 6.2 but heard that there are many issues and need to be upgraded to 6.3
> or
> > so.
>
> If you need a search engine to be up and in production quickly, the
> recommendation right now is the latest version - 6.6.1.  This is the
> thirteenth release in the 6.x line, and represents over a year of new
> features and bugfixes since the 6.0.0 release.
>
> The 7.0 release is underway right now, and could be announced as soon as
> later this week.  It also might end up delayed.  That depends on whether
> problems are found and if so, what those problems are.
>
> If you have a longer timeframe before you need to be online, it would
> probably be a good idea to plan on testing 7.0 when it is released, and
> be ready to upgrade your test environment to new 7.x versions as they
> come out.  You could choose to test 6.6.1 and 7.x concurrently, and go
> with whichever version you can get working correctly.
>
> My personal feeling is that a brand new major release (x.0 version)
> should not be deployed into production without an extensive amount of
> testing.  That applies to ANY software, not just Solr.  It's not that I
> think the 7.0 version is going to be bad software.  It's just that it
> hasn't received any widespread user testing yet, so any major problems
> are currently unknown.  The developers do a lot of testing, but they can
> only come up with so many test scenarios.  Real-world installations tend
> to be better at sniffing out bugs.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>

Reply via email to