My other concern would be your p's and q's. If you start mixing in Boolean logic and solrs weak respect for it, it could be unpredictable
> On Sep 3, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Phil Scadden <p.scad...@gns.cri.nz> wrote: > > 5 seems a reasonable limit to me. After that revert to slow. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, 2 September 2017 12:01 p.m. > To: solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > Subject: Re: query with wild card with AND taking lot of time > > How far would you take that? Say you had 100 terms joined by AND (ridiculous > I know, just sayin' ). Then you'd chew up 100 entries in the filterCache. > >> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> >> wrote: >> Hmm. Solr really should convert an fq of “a AND b” to separate “a” and “b” >> fq filters. That should be a simple special-case rewrite. It might take less >> time to implement than explaining it to everyone. >> >> Well, I guess then we’d have to explain how it wasn’t really necessary >> to send separate fq params… >> >> wunder >> Walter Underwood >> wun...@wunderwood.org >> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) >> >> >>> On Sep 1, 2017, at 2:01 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Shawn: >>> >>> See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7219 >>> >>> Try fq=filter(foo) filter(bar) filter(baz) >>> >>> Patches to docs welcome ;).... >>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: >>>>> On 9/1/2017 8:13 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: >>>>> You can OR cachable filter queries in the latest Solr. There is a >>>>> special >>>>> (filter) syntax for that. >>>> >>>> This is actually possible? If so, I didn't see anything come across >>>> the dev list about it. >>>> >>>> I opened an issue for it, didn't know anything had been implemented. >>>> After I opened the issue, I discovered that I was merely the latest >>>> to do so, it had been requested before. >>>> >>>> Can you point to the relevant part of the reference guide and the >>>> Jira issue where the change was committed? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Shawn >>>> >> > Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential and may not be used, > published or redistributed without the prior written consent of the Institute > of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science). If received in > error please destroy and immediately notify GNS Science. Do not copy or > disclose the contents.
