Luca Can you give me an example? If category_id is 9500, what would you want to sort on? -- Rick
On August 16, 2017 5:19:56 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto <tenacious...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote: >Hello Rick, >I have no algorithm: user choose the order of the categories, and the >sources, For example: > > >For Category: >- at position 0 category_id 9500. >- at position 1 category_id 10. >- at position 2 category_ud 555. >(etc...) > > >For Source: > >- at position 0 source_id 12. >- at position 1 source_id 30. > >- at position 2 source_id 3. > >(etc...) > > >After that, user decide what kind of sort apply. >For example: fist by DATE, then by CATEGORY, then by SOURCE and then by >NAME. >I have 1 array with all category Ids with correct order decided by user >and another one with source Ids in correct order decided by user. >Then I have another array that specify the sort type (like example, >user should ask documents ordered by DATE first, then by CATEGORY, >etc... ) >Natural sort order could be fine only for DATE and NAME, but for >CATEGORY and SOURCE I have to use the array with ids sorted by user. >Thanks! > >Luca > >On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 6:54 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> >wrote: > > > Luca, >What is the algorithm for the custom sort order? -- Rick > >On August 7, 2017 6:38:49 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto ><tenacious...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote: >>Hello Rick, >>thanks for your answer. >>Yes, I compose solr query from frontend request, but I'm not able to >>sort by a custom order, only by natural order (for example: >>sort=category desc, source desc, /*...*/ ). >>How do you set a custom sort order in solr? >>Thanks >> >>Luca >> >> >> >> >>On Friday, August 4, 2017 7:41 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> >>wrote: >> >> >> Luca >>I hope you have a web app in front of Solr. It could accept parameters >>from the browser, then construct the query as necessary to do your >>sorting. Cheers -- Rick >> >>On August 4, 2017 5:32:31 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto >><tenacious...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote: >>>Hello, >>>sorry for the late, I was out of my home. >>> >>> >>>In response to Rick: >>>I can't do that because: >>>1) each user should have multiple sort (for example user "A" can sort >>>by date and then by category and then by name ...) . >>>2) the sort is not natural sort: user has a custom order for a field >>>(for example sorting category field of user "A" could be category 10 >>at >>>position 1, category 2 at position 2, category 9500 at position 3, >>>category 40 at position 5 ...). >>> >>> >>>In response to Susheel:have you done an example? >>> >>>Thanks for your response. >>> >>>Luca >>> >>> >>> >>>On Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:10 AM, Susheel Kumar >>><susheel2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Let me try to put an example for custom sort. >>> >>>On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> >wrote: >>> >>>> Luca, >>>> You can pass a sort parameter in the query. User A could >>>sort=date%20desc >>>> and user b could sort=foofield%20asc. >>>> >>>> Maybe query functions can also help with this. Cheers -- Rick >>>> >>>> On July 19, 2017 4:39:59 AM EDT, Luca Dall'Osto >>>> <tenacious...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote: >>>> >Hello,The problem of build an index is that each user has a custom >>>> >source order and category order: are not static orders (for >example >>>> >user X could have category:5 as most important category but user Y >>>> >could have category:9 as most important). >>>> >Has anyone ever written a custom sort function in solr?Maybe a >link >>>of >>>> >a tutorial or an example could be very helpful. Thanks >>>> > >>>> >Luca >>>> > >>>> >On Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:18 PM, alessandro.benedetti >>>> ><a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >"I have different "sort preferences", so I can't build a index and >>>use >>>> >for >>>> >sorting.Maybe I have to sort by category then by source and by >>>language >>>> >or >>>> >by source, then by category and by date" >>>> > >>>> >I would like to focus on this bit. >>>> >It is ok to go for a custom function and sort at query time, but I >>>am >>>> >curious to explore why an index time solution should not be ok. >>>> >You can have these distinct fields : >>>> >source_priority >>>> >language_priority >>>> >category_priority >>>> >ect >>>> > >>>> >This values can be assigned at the documents at indexing time ( >>>using >>>> >for >>>> >example a custom update request processor). >>>> >Then at query time you can easily sort on those values in a multi >>>> >layered >>>> >approach : >>>> >sort:source_priority desc, category_priority desc >>>> >Of course, if the priority for a source changes quite often or if >>>it's >>>> >user >>>> >dependent, a query time solution would be preferred. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >----- >>>> >--------------- >>>> >Alessandro Benedetti >>>> >Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director >>>> >Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io >>>> >-- >>>> >View this message in context: >>>> >http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-results-in- >>>> multiple-orders-multiple-boosts-tp4346304p4346559.html >>>> >Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com >>> >>> >>> >> >>-- >>Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com >> >> > >-- >Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com > > -- Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo dot com
