Yup, got it! On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Amrit Sarkar <sarkaramr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sujay, > > Lucene index is in flat-object document style, so I really not think nested > documents at index / storage will ever be supported unless someone change > the very intricacy of the index. > > Amrit Sarkar > Search Engineer > Lucidworks, Inc. > 415-589-9269 > www.lucidworks.com > Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks > LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2 > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Sujay Bawaskar <sujaybawas...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks Amrit. So storage mechanism of parent child documents is limiting > > the capability of partial update. It would be great to have flawless > parent > > child index support in solr. > > > > On 17-Jul-2017 11:14 PM, "Amrit Sarkar" <sarkaramr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Sujay, > > > > > > Not really. Parent-child documents are stored in a single block > > > contiguously. Read more about parent-child relationship at: > > > https://medium.com/@sarkaramrit2/multiple- > documents-with-same-doc-id-in- > > > index-in-solr-cloud-32c072db2164 > > > > > > While we perform partial / atomic update, say {"id":"X", > > > "fieldA":{"set":"Z"}, that particular doc with X will be fetched (all > the > > > "stored" fields), update will be performed and indexed, all happens in > > > *DistributedUpdateProcessor* internally. So there is no way it will > fetch > > > the child documents along with it. > > > > > > I am not sure whether this can be done with current code or it will be > > > fixed / improved in the future. > > > > > > Amrit Sarkar > > > Search Engineer > > > Lucidworks, Inc. > > > 415-589-9269 > > > www.lucidworks.com > > > Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks > > > LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2 > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Sujay Bawaskar < > > sujaybawas...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Need a help to understand solr parent child document partial update > > > > behaviour. Can we perform partial update on parent document without > > > losing > > > > its chiild documents? My observation is that parent child > relationship > > > > between documents get lost in case partial update is performed on > > parent. > > > > Any work around or solution to this issue? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks, > > > > Sujay P Bawaskar > > > > M:+91-77091 53669 > > > > > > > > > >
