S G, Not sure about the documentation but:
The CloudSolrClient uses a connection to zookeeper to extract cluster information like who is a the leader for a shard in a solr collection. To create a CloudSolrClient all you specify is the zookeepers and which collection you want to work with. Behind the scenes solrj will load balance and send the request to the right "shard" in the cluster. The CloudSolrClient is better if you have a cluster of multiple solr nodes across multiple machines. While in LBHttpSolrClient, load balancing is done using a simple round-robin on the list of servers. Hope this helps. Amrit Sarkar Search Engineer Lucidworks, Inc. 415-589-9269 www.lucidworks.com Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2 On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:38 PM, S G <sg.online.em...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know if CloudSolrClient is preferred over LBHttpSolrClient ? > If yes, why so and has there been any good performance benefits documented > anywhere? > > Thanks > SG >
