Poornima,
Regarding 3;
You can do something like:
CloudSolrClient client = new CloudSolrClient("localhost:9983");
SolrParams params = new ModifiableSolrParams().add("q","*:*")
.add("json.facet","{.....}");
QueryResponse response = client.query(params);
Setting key and value via SolrParams is available.
Amrit Sarkar
Search Engineer
Lucidworks, Inc.
415-589-9269
www.lucidworks.com
Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Ponnuswamy, Poornima (GE Healthcare) <
poornima.ponnusw...@ge.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have Solr version 6.4.2 and we have been using Solr Subfaceting –
> Terms Facet as per the document https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/solr/Faceted+Search in our project.
>
> In our project which is going to go in production soon, we use it for
> getting the facet/subfacet counts, sort etc. We make a direct rest call to
> solr and the counts matches perfectly. I have few questions and
> clarification on this approach and appreciate your response on this.
>
>
>
> 1. In confluence - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/
> Faceted+Search it page says its experimental and may change
> significantly. Is it safe for us to use the Terms faceting or will it
> change in future releases?. When will this be official?.
> 2. As Term faceting has few advantages over Pivot facet as per
> http://yonik.com/solr-subfacets/ we went on with it. Is it safe to use it
> or do we use Pivot faceting instead?
> 3. Currently we make a rest call to Solr API to get results. Now we are
> planning to move to Solr Cloud and use Solrj library to integrate with
> Solr. I don’t see any support for Terms faceting (json.facet) in Solrj
> library. Am I overlooking it or will it be supported in future releases?
>
> Appreciate your response.
>
> Thanks,
> Poornima
>
>
