There are a number of functions that are currently being held up because of
conflicting duplicate function names. We haven't come to an agreement yet
on the best way forward for this yet. I think we should open a separate
ticket to discuss how best to handle this issue.


Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Susheel Kumar <susheel2...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Does "uniq" expression sounds good to use for UniqueMetric class?
>
> Thanks,
> Susheel
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Susheel Kumar <susheel2...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Joel,
> >
> > I tried to create a patch to add UniqueMetric and it works, but soon
> > realized, we have UniqueStream as well and can't load both of them (like
> > below) when required,  since both uses "unique" keyword.
> >
> > Any advice how we can handle this.  Come up with different keyword for
> > UniqueMetric or rename UniqueStream etc..?
> >
> >                        StreamFactory factory = new StreamFactory()
> >      .withCollectionZkHost (...)
> >                        .withFunctionName("facet", FacetStream.class)
> >      .withFunctionName("sum", SumMetric.class)
> >      .withFunctionName("unique", UniqueStream.class)
> >      .withFunctionName("unique", UniqueMetric.class)
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This is mainly due to focus on other things. It would great to support
> all
> >> the aggregate functions in facet, rollup and timeseries expressions.
> >>
> >> Joel Bernstein
> >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <
> >> edwinye...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > We are working on the Solr Streaming expression, using the facet
> stream
> >> > source.
> >> >
> >> > As the underlying structure is using JSON Facet, would like to find
> out
> >> why
> >> > the unique() metrics is not supported? Currently, it only supports
> >> sum(col)
> >> > , avg(col), min(col), max(col), count(*)
> >> >
> >> > I'm using Solr 6.5.1
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Edwin
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to