Hmmmm, you might be able to use a DocTransformer. Hmm, in fact that would work if you can keep the two separate. It just injects fields into the docs when they're being output. It would be the world's simplest transformer if it injected a hard-coded collection name (you'd have to have unique transformers per collection). With a little more work it should be possible to get the collection name from the available data.
Best, Erick On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:21 AM, alessandro.benedetti <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > I second Erick, > it would be as easy as adding this field to the schema : > > <field name="collection" type="string" > indexed="false" stored="true" default="<your > collection name>"/> > > If you are using inter collections queries, just be aware there a lot of > tricky and subtle problems with it ( such as unique Identifier must have > same field name, distributed IDF inter collections ect ect) > I am preparing a blog post related that. > I will keep you updated. > > Cheers > > > > ----- > --------------- > Alessandro Benedetti > Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Collection-name-in-result-tp4342474p4342501.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
