In general, the documents which has more or all terms matched against query terms will be boosted higher per lucene tf/idf scoring.
So for document having ABC DEF queries like ABC DEF XYZ or XYZ ABC DEF will find a match(assuming q.op=AND) and will be boosted higher compare to documents with ABC or only DEF. If you do not want match when user query is like ABC or ABC XYZ then you have to use phrase queries or fields with keyword tokenizer etc. and in which case above queries will not work. Thnx On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I have a problem ,I need to give the boost to a particular field if and > only if the query contains entire field value (String contains like > feature). > e.g. if Field value is ABC DEF > It should match if user query is like ABC DEF XYZ or XYZ ABC DEF, But it > should not match when user query is like ABC or ABC XYZ > I'm using Solr-6.6.0 > also using edismax parser > > I tried creating the custom field like > > <fieldType name="cust_shingle" class="solr.TextField" > enableGraphQueries="false"> > <analyzer type="index"> > <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.PatternReplaceFilterFactory" pattern=" " > replace="all" replacement=""/> > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > </analyzer> > <analyzer type="query"> > <tokenizer class="solr.WhiteSpaceTokenizerFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.ShingleFilterFactory" minShingleSize="2" > outputUnigrams="true" maxShingleSize="5" tokenSeparator=" "/> > <filter class="solr.PatternReplaceFilterFactory" pattern=" " > replace="all" replacement=""/> > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > </analyzer> > > > But it creating the synonyms query like (user query= 7 armour) > > +(((nameSearchNoSyn:7 nameSearchNoSyn:armour)~2)^9.0 | ((brandSearch:7 > brandSearch:armour)~2) | > > ((nameSearch:7 nameSearch:armour)~2)^4.0 | (keywords:7 armour)^11.0 | > > ((descSearchNoSyn:7 descSearchNoSyn:armour)~2)^2.0 | > > *((Synonym(brandSearchQueryShingle:7 brandSearchQueryShingle:7armour) > brandSearchQueryShingle:armour)~2)^10.0* | > > ((descriptionSearch:7 descriptionSearch:armour)~2) | > (categoryKeywords:7 armour)^11.0) ((nameSearch:"7 armour"~5)^9.0 | > > (brandSearch:"7 armour"~5)^8.0 | (descriptionSearch:"7 > armour"~5)^2.0) ((nameSearch:"7 armour")^9.0 | > > (descriptionSearch:"7 armour")^2.0) > > > which again is not matching docs , > > Any idea how to boost the document if the user query contains exact > value of that field > > > my request handler is as > > > <lst name="/browse"> > <str name="name">/browse</str> > <str name="class">solr.SearchHandler</str> > <lst name="defaults"> > <str name="echoParams">explicit</str> > <str name="wt">velocity</str> > <str name="indent">true</str> > <str name="v.template">browse</str> > <str name="v.layout">layout</str> > <str name="title">Solritas</str> > <str name="defType">edismax</str> > <str name="qf"> > nameSearch^4 brandSearch *brandSearchQueryShingle*^10 > descriptionSearch categoryKeywords^11 keywords^11 nameSearchNoSyn^9 > descSearchNoSyn^2 > </str> > <str name="ps">5</str> > <str name="pf"> > nameSearch^9 brandSearch^8 descriptionSearch^2 categoryKeywords^10 > keywords^10 > </str> > <str name="pf2">nameSearch^9 descriptionSearch^2</str> > <str name="ps2">0</str> > <str name="df">searchFields</str> > <str name="mm">100%</str> > <str name="q.alt">*:*</str> > <str name="rows">10</str> > <str name="fl">*,score</str> > <str name="facet.mincount">1</str> > <str name="facet.range.other">after</str> > <str name="spellcheck">true</str> > <str name="spellcheck.extendedResults">false</str> > <str name="spellcheck.count">5</str> > <str name="spellcheck.alternativeTermCount">2</str> > <str name="spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest">5</str> > <str name="spellcheck.collate">true</str> > <str name="spellcheck.collateExtendedResults">true</str> > <str name="spellcheck.maxCollationTries">5</str> > <str name="spellcheck.maxCollations">10</str> > <str name="sow">*false*</str> > </lst> > <arr name="last-components"> > <str>spellcheck</str> > </arr> > </lst> > > > Thanks, > > Aman Deep Singh >
