Since I authored the patch, I'm guilty on all counts. :-) Amit Nithian wrote: > > I am not sure why they chose that direction over built-in entity include. > Entities are not the most used or known feature and I just did not think of this was a way to do it. I also wanted variable expansion in the 'resource name' which might not be easy to obtain through entities.
Amit Nithian wrote: > > The patch page says that the include resource is an experimental feature > It is a debated feature; acknowledging the use-case & need, the amount of code dedicated to configuration (versus pure search features), the urge to get release 1.3 out... I just wanted to make clear this was in flux. Cheers Henri -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/XML-includes-in-solrconfig.xml-schema.xml-tp19096292p19097895.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
