Just to confirm again before go too far, are you able to execute these
examples and see same output given under "Optimistic Concurrency".
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents#UpdatingPartsofDocuments-In-PlaceUpdates
Let me know which example you fail to get same output as described in.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Sergio García Maroto <marot...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I had a look to the source code and I see
> DocBasedVersionConstraintsProcessorFactory
>
> if (0 < ((Comparable)newUserVersion).compareTo((Comparable)
> oldUserVersion)) {
> // log.info("VERSION returning true (proceed with update)" );
> return true;
> }
>
> I can't find a way of overwriting same version without changing that piece
> of code.
> Would be possible to add a parameter to the
> "DocBasedVersionConstraintsProcessorFactory" something like
> "overwrite.same.version=true"
> so the new code would look like.
>
>
> int compareTo = ((Comparable)newUserVersion).compareTo((Comparable)
> oldUserVersion);
> if ( ((overwritesameversion) && 0 <= compareTo) || (0 < compareTo)) {
> // log.info("VERSION returning true (proceed with update)" );
> return true;
> }
>
>
> Is that thing going to break anyhting? Can i do that change?
>
> Thanks
> Sergio
>
>
> On 2 June 2017 at 10:10, Sergio García Maroto <marot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I am using 6.1.0.
> > I tried with two different field types, long and date.
> > <field name="versionEpoch" type="long" indexed="true" stored="true" />
> > <field name="UpdatedDateSD" type="date" indexed="true" stored="true"/>
> >
> > I am using this configuration on the solrconfig.xml
> >
> > <updateRequestProcessorChain default="true">
> > <processor class="solr.DocBasedVersionConstraintsProc
> essorFactory">
> > <bool name="ignoreOldUpdates">false</bool>
> > <str name="versionField">UpdatedDateSD</str>
> > </processor>
> > <processor class="solr.DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory" />
> > <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" />
> > <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory"/>
> > </updateRequestProcessorChain>
> >
> > i had a look to the wiki page and it says https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents
> >
> > *Once configured, this update processor will reject (HTTP error code 409)
> > any attempt to update an existing document where the value of
> > the my_version_l field in the "new" document is not greater then the
> value
> > of that field in the existing document.*
> >
> > Do you have any tip on how to get same versions not getting rejected.
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> >
> >
> > On 1 June 2017 at 19:04, Susheel Kumar <susheel2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Which version of solr are you using? I tested in 6.0 and if I supply
> same
> >> version, it overwrite/update the document exactly as per the wiki
> >> documentation.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Susheel
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:57 AM, marotosg <marot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Thanks a lot Susheel.
> >> > I see this is actually what I need. I have been testing it and
> notice
> >> the
> >> > value of the field has to be always greater for a new document to get
> >> > indexed. if you send the same version number it doesn't work.
> >> >
> >> > Is it possible somehow to overwrite documents with the same version?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.
> >> > nabble.com/version-Versioning-using-timespan-tp4338171p4338475.html
> >> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
