Hi , If there is a request handler configured in solrconfig.xml and update the Conf in zookeeper it should show up
If already did it try reloading configuration Thanks Ravi On Fri, 12 May 2017 at 9:46 AM, Thomas Porschberg <tho...@randspringer.de> wrote: > > > This is another problem I see: With my non-cloud core I have a > conf-directory where I have dataimport.xml, schema.xml and solrconfig.xml. > > > I think these 3 files are enough to import my data from my relational > database. > > > Under example/cloud I could not find one of them. How to setup DIH for > the solrcould? > > > > The entire configuration (what would normally be in the conf directory) > > is in zookeeper when you're in cloud mode, not in the core directories. > > You must upload a directory containing the same files that would > > normally be in a conf directory as a named configset to zookeeper before > > you try to create your collection. This is something that the "bin/solr > > create" command does for you in cloud mode, typically using one of the > > configsets included on the disk as a source. > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Using+ZooKeeper+to+Manage+Configuration+Files > > > Ok, thank you. I did the following steps. > > 1. Started an external zookeeper > 2. Copied a conf-directory to zookeeper: > bin/solr zk upconfig -n books -d $HOME/solr-6.5.1/server/solr/tommy/conf > -z localhost:2181 > // This is a conf-directory from a standalone solr when dataimport was > working! > --> Connecting to ZooKeeper at localhost:2181 ... > Uploading <....> for config books to ZooKeeper at localhost:2181 > // I think no errors, but how can I check it in zookeeper? I found no > files solrconfig.xml ... > in the zookeeper directories (installation dir and data dir) > 3. Started solr: > bin/solr start -c > 4. Created a books collection with 2 shards > bin/solr create -c books -shards 2 > > Result: I see in the web-ui my books collection with the 2 shards. No > errors so far. > However, the Dataimport-entry says: > "Sorry, no dataimport-handler defined!" > > What could be the reason? > > Thomas >
